期刊文献+

乳腺癌患者心理弹性量表的汉化及信效度检验 被引量:13

Reliability and Validity Test of the Chinese Version of Breast Cancer Survivors Resilience Scale
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的翻译乳腺癌患者心理弹性量表并检验其信效度。方法遵循Brislin模型对量表进行翻译,经过两轮德尔菲专家咨询形成最终量表。用中文版乳腺癌患者心理弹性量表对200名乳腺癌患者进行测试,以检验其信度和效度。结果中文版乳腺癌患者心理弹性量表经过因子分析最大方差正交旋转法,共提取2个因子、16个条目,累计贡献率为73.666%。量表共有个体保护(11个条目)和社会保护(5个条目)2个维度。总量表Cronbach’sα系数为0.948,个体保护维度Cronbach’sα系数0.931,社会保护维度Cronbach’sα系数0.943;总量表的折半信度为0.918;重测信度为0.905。量表各条目I-CVI为0.858~1.00,总量表S-CVI/Ave为0.947。结论中文版乳腺癌患者心理弹性量表的信度、效度良好,可作为衡量我国乳腺癌患者心理弹性的有效量表。 Objective To translate the English version of the breast cancer survivors resilience scale(BCRS)into Chinese,and to test its reliability and validity of the Chinese version.Methods The scale was translated according to the Brislin Model,and the final version was settled after two rounds of Delphi expert consultation.The reliability and validity of the Chinese version were tested with 200 breast cancer patients.Results The cumulative contribution rate of the Chinese version of BCSRS was 73.666%by the factor analysis of the maximum variance orthogonal rotation method.Two dimension were extracted,including 16 items.The first dimension was individual protection factors with 11 items and the second dimension was social protection factors with 5 items.The Cronbach’sαcoefficient of the total scale was 0.948 and the Cronbach’sαcoefficients of each dimension were 0.931 and 0.943 respectively.The half reliability of the total scale was 0.918 while the test-retest reliability was 0.905.The I-CVI of each item was 0.858-1.00,and the S-CVI/Ave of total scale was 0.947.Conclusions The Chinese version of BCSRS has good reliability and validity,which can be used as an effective scale to measure resilience of breast cancer patients in China.
作者 刘卉 黄菊 刘娟 LIU Hui;HUANG Ju;LIU Juan(General Surgery Department,Fuyang people’s Hospital,Fuyang 230000,Anhui Province,China)
出处 《解放军护理杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2021年第6期27-29,33,共4页 Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
关键词 乳腺癌 心理弹性 信度 效度 breast cancer resilience reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献96

  • 1王才康,胡中锋,刘勇.一般自我效能感量表的信度和效度研究[J].应用心理学,2001,7(1):37-40. 被引量:2734
  • 2孙晓军,周宗奎.探索性因子分析及其在应用中存在的主要问题[J].心理科学,2005,28(6):1440-1442. 被引量:91
  • 3方积乾主编.生物医学研究的统计方法[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006.
  • 4曹伟新,李乐之.外科护理学[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:575.
  • 5Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 6Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 7Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 8Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 9Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 10Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.

共引文献1295

同被引文献163

引证文献13

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部