期刊文献+

养老护理员疏于照顾评估量表的编制及信效度检验 被引量:6

Development and reliability and validity test of elder neglect scale for geriatric nursing assistants
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:编制养老护理员疏于照顾评估量表,并检验其信效度。方法:以情境理论为理论基础,通过查阅文献、概念分析和半结构化访谈构建量表条目池,经过专家函询和预试验形成量表修订版,对407名养老护理员进行问卷调查,检验量表的信效度。结果:形成的养老护理员疏于照顾评估量表包含身体忽视、心理忽视、经济忽视和医疗忽视4个维度,共17个条目。量表总的Cronbach's α系数为0.877,各维度的Cronbach's α系数为0.764~0.944。量表总的重测信度为0.944,各维度的重测信度为0.892~0.968。量表水平的内容效度(S-CVI)为0.992,条目水平的内容效度(I-CVI)为0.857~1.000。探索性因子分析提取出4个公因子,累计方差贡献率为68.140%。结论:编制的养老护理员疏于照顾评估量表具有良好的信效度,可以作为我国养老机构中养老护理员疏于照顾测评的工具。 Objective:To develop the elder neglect scale for geriatric nursing assistants,and to test its reliability and validity.Methods:Based on the situational theory,the items pool was formed through literature review,concept analysis and semi-structured interviews.After taking the expert's inquiry by letter and pre-test,the revised version of scale was developed.A total of 407 geriatric nursing assistants were selected as subjects.And the reliability and validity of scale were tested.Results:The final elder neglect scale for geriatric nursing assistants included following 4 dimensions:physical neglect,psychological neglect,economic neglect and medical neglect,involving 17 items.The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total scale was 0.877.And the Cronbach's α coefficients of each dimension ranged from 0.764 to 0.944.The retest reliability of the scale was 0.944.And the retest reliability of each dimension ranged from 0.892 to 0.968.The scale level-content validity index(S-CVI)was 0.992.And the item level-content validity indexs(I-CVI)ranged from 0.857 to 1.000.Exploratory factor analysis(EFA)extracted 4 common factors,whose cumulative contribution of variance accounted for 68.140%of total variance.Conclusions:The elder neglect scale for geriatric nursing assistants has good reliability and validity,which can be used as a tool for evaluating the elder neglect of the geriatric nursing assistants in nursing homes in China.
作者 杜亚格 刘婕 张春梅 张丽萍 窦昊颖 DU Yage;LIU Jie;ZHANG Chunmei;ZHANG Liping;DOU Haoying(Nursing College of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin 301617 China)
出处 《护理研究》 北大核心 2021年第19期3385-3389,共5页 Chinese Nursing Research
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目,编号:71704133。
关键词 养老护理员 疏于照顾 信度 效度 量表研究 geriatric nursing assistants elder neglect reliability validity scale study
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献61

  • 1Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 2Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 3Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 4Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 5Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 6Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 7Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.
  • 8Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure youknow what’s being reported?critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489–497.
  • 9Nora JJ.Causes old and new modes,mechanisms and models.Am Heart J,1993,125:1409
  • 10Hoffman JIE.Congenital heart disease:incidence and inheritance.Ped Clin North Am,1990,37:25

共引文献1112

同被引文献59

引证文献6

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部