摘要
(一)额济纳汉简“专部士吏典趣辄”册书首简文字争议很多,尤其“辄”字至今缺乏善解,经研究,它应该是名词连用的“条辄”“辄条”之“辄”,指“专部士吏”主持、督促相关工作可以依据的规条。拿首简文字为册书命名没有问题。(二)松柏汉墓“献枇杷令”中“至不足,令相备;不足,尽所得”一段话过去标点和理解有误,其中“至”当看作连词,从动词“至”语法化而来,仍含有运动、位移的语义要素。(三)天长纪庄19号墓“丙充国”书信牍中旧被释作“槿”的字当释为“栈”,读为“贱”;旧被释为“廌”的字当释为“寄”。
(1)There is a lot of controversy in words of the volume named“专部士吏典趣辄”in Ejina Bamboo Slips of Han Dynasty.Especially,there is no good explanation on“Zhe(辄)”.Based on our findings,the word“Zhe(辄)”means rules.(2)There is a Decree named“献枇杷令”unearthed from theSongBai Han tomb.In the article,there is such a paragraph“至不足,令相备;不足,尽所得”which has been misunderstand.We conclude the word“至(Zhi)”should be seen as conjunctions.(3)The Chinese character“栈”in BingChongGuo’s letter unearthed from the JiZhuang Han tomb was mistaken for“槿”.Similarity,the word“寄”was mistaken for“廌”.
作者
任攀
Ren Pan(Research and Conservation Center for Unearthed Texts,Tsinghua University,Beijing,100084;Research Center of Collaborative Innovation of Unearthed Documents and Chinese Ancient Civilization,Tsinghua University,Beijing,100084;Department of Chinese,Tsinghua University,Beijing,100084)
出处
《语文学刊》
2021年第5期52-58,共7页
Journal of Language and Literature Studies
基金
2019年度国家社科基金冷门“绝学”和国别史等研究专项“汉晋简牍名物词整理与研究”(19VJX091)的支持。