摘要
联合国在全球气候治理格局中曾处于中心位置,但由于联盟格局的多元化、大国政治权威的不稳定性、气候政治议题范畴的分散,其地位出现动摇。而联合国外的气候治理实践却在不断发展,集中体现在国际组织等治理平台的“气候化”、气候共同体的网络化和市场路径的低碳创新等方面。从两者互动的逻辑关系来看,气候治理的联合国内外二元轨道在气候治理起始、发展和成熟转型的不同阶段既存在积极互动,也存在消极互动。两种路径具有互补优势,较为理想的发展趋势是构建一种政治信号与社会、市场之间动态平衡的稳定机制。中国在联合国与联合国外混合驱动的复杂局势中既可获益,也面临更多竞争压力,需要坚持联合国与联合国外、政治与市场的统筹进路。
The United Nations was once at the center of global climate governance. Due to the plural-ism of the alliance pattern, the instability of the political authority of major powers and thedispersion of the scope of issues concerning climate politics, the central position of the UNhas been shaken. At the same time, the practice of climate governance outside the UN hascontinued to develop, which is concentrated in the “climatization” of governance platformssuch as international organizations, the networking of the climate community and the lowcarbon innovation of market paths. From the perspective of the interactive relationship,there are both positive and negative interactions between the two paths within and outsidethe UN at different stages of climate governance, which possess complementary advantages.The practice of governance outside the UN is not a separate stove. The ideal developmenttrend is to build a stable mechanism with dynamic balance among political signal, societyand market. Although China can benefit in a complex situation driven by a mixture of thetwo paths, it as well faces more competitive pressures. It is necessary to adhere to an inte-grated approach of the two paths.
作者
于宏源
李坤海
YU Hongyuan;LI Kunhai
出处
《欧洲研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第1期64-84,I0003,I0004,共23页
Chinese Journal of European Studies
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“拜登上任以来中美碳外交关系的非线性变化和应对研究”(项目编号:21BGJ054)的阶段性研究成果
国家重点研发计划项目“气候变化风险的全球治理与国内应对关键问题研究”课题一(2018YFC1509001)的阶段性研究成果。