期刊文献+

土木、水利与海洋工程:大土木类本科宽口径培养模式探索与实践 被引量:8

Civil Engineering and Systems:Exploration and Practice of Liberal Education Mode in Civil Engineering Undergraduate Program
原文传递
导出
摘要 通识教育逐渐成为国内外高等教育的共识。本文总结了清华大学土木类学科通识教育的大类宽口径培养模式。立足于高水平本科教育和专业教育,充分调研了国外高水平土木类学科的本科培养模式,阐述了清华大学土木大类宽口径专业的培养目标与专业重塑、培养路径以及课程体系建设的思路,并以土木工程专业为例给出了四年制171学分的宽口径专业培养方案;总结了土木大类本科培养的主要支撑体系建设,包括实验实践教学平台建设、大类学生管理体系以及大类培养质量控制与反馈体系的建设。同时,结合外部教育专家评审和近4年的大类培养实践,总结了土木大类宽口径本科培养的经验,并提出了大类培养面临的外部评价等方面的挑战。 Liberal education is becoming acceptable worldwide in higher education.This paper introduces the liberal education mode of Civil Engineering and Systems(CES)undergraduate program in Tsinghua University.Standing for high-quality undergraduate education and professional education,this paper studies the undergraduate education mode of overseas high-level civil engineering disciplines,and illustrates the educational objective and major reshaping,educational process,and curriculum structure of liberal education in CES undergraduate program in Tsinghua University.Civil engineering,as one of divisions of CES,is taken as an example to describe the curriculum structure of CES,with four-year study and 171 credits.Furthermore,the basic systems to support CES are presented,including experimental and practical teaching platforms,student affairs management systems,and quality control and assessment systems.Besides,based on the review from external education experts and four-year CES trials,the experience in CES liberal education is summarized and relevant challenges such as external assessment presented as well.
作者 李克非 张建民 方东平 郭红领 朱德军 韩建国 苏芃 Li Kefei;Zhang Jianmin;Fang Dongping;Guo Hongling;Zhu Dejun;Han Jianguo;Su Peng
出处 《高等工程教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第3期46-51,共6页 Research in Higher Education of Engineering
关键词 土木大类 专业重塑 宽口径培养 培养目标 课程体系 civil engineering and systems major reshaping liberal education educational objective curriculum structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献28

  • 1兰久富.走出价值哲学的理论困境[J].哲学动态,2004(7):13-16. 被引量:18
  • 2王文华.耶鲁大学通识教育[J].世界教育信息,2007,20(1):76-77. 被引量:16
  • 3MIT School of Humanities,Arts and Social Sciences.Great Ideas Change the World[EB/OL].[2015-09-25].http://shass.mit.edu/inside/history.
  • 4MIT.Report of the Committee on General Education[R].The Technology Press of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology,1949:86.
  • 5庞海勺.通识教育困境与希望[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社,2009:170-171.
  • 6Steven Brint,Kristopher Proctor,Scott Patrick Murphy,Lori Turk-Bicakci,Robert A.Hanneman.General Education Models:Continuity and Change in the U.S.Undergraduate Curriculum,1975-2000[J].The Journal of Higher Education,2009,80(6):605-641.
  • 7MIT.Report of the MIT Task Force on Student Life and Learning[R].Cambridge:MIT Press,1998:32-39.
  • 8Harold Taylor.The Philosophical Foundations of General Education in General Education FiftyFirst Yearbook,Part I,National Society for the Study of Education[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1952:30-35.
  • 9Boning,Kenneth.Coherence in General Education:a Historical Look[J].The Journal of General Education,2007,56(1):1-16.
  • 10MIT.About MIT[EB/OL].[2015-04-09].http://web.mit.edu/aboutmit/.

共引文献50

同被引文献69

引证文献8

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部