期刊文献+

学习进阶视域下的高考物理实验试题分析与教学策略——以2022年全国甲卷物理实验试题为例 被引量:4

Analysis and teaching strategies of physics experiment tests in college entrance examination from the perspective of learning progression——Taking the experiment tests of 2022 national paper A as an example
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以2022年全国甲卷物理实验试题为例,探索学习进阶视域下的高考物理试题分析与教学策略.发现学习进阶层级与科学探究水平存在对应关系:经验层级对应水平1,映射层级对应水平2,关联层级对应水平3,系统层级对应水平4,整合层级对应水平5.得到学习进阶视域下的高考物理教学策略:用“一量多材”突破映射层级试题,用“一理多用”突破关联层级试题,用“以点为面”突破系统层级试题,用“以法为心”突破整合层级试题. Taking the physics experiment tests of 2022 National Paper A as an example,the analysis and teaching strategies of physics experiment tests in college entrance examination from the perspective of learning progression were explored.The corresponding relationship between the level of learning progression and the level of scientific inquiry was found:experience level corresponded to level 1,mapping level corresponds to level 2,correlation level corresponded to level 3,system level corresponded to level 4,and integration level corresponded to level 5.The teaching strategies of college entrance examination physics from the perspective of learning progression were obtained:one quantity and multiple materials was used to break through the mapping level tests,law of multi-purpose was used to break through the correlation level tests,point as the surface was used to break through the system level tests,law as the heart was used to break through the integration level tests.
作者 董友军 朱建山 刘芳 DONG You-jun;ZHU Jian-shan;LIU Fang(Guangzhou Experimental School Affiliated to BNU,Guangzhou 510700,China;Mashantou School,Guangming District,Shenzhen 518106,China;Beijing Institute of Education Fengtai Branch,Beijing 100073,China)
出处 《物理实验》 2022年第9期48-53,共6页 Physics Experimentation
基金 广东教育学会“十四五”教育科研重点课题(No.GDESH14002)。
关键词 学习进阶 科学探究 高考试题分析 教学策略 advanced learning scientific inquiry tests analysis teaching strategies
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献51

  • 1何克抗.建构主义的教学模式、教学方法与教学设计[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),1997(5):74-81. 被引量:2360
  • 2Lisa Fratt. Less is more: trimming the overstuffed curriculum [EB/OL]. [20120307]. http://www, project2061, org/pub- lications/articles/articles/da, htm,.
  • 3美国科学促进会.科学素养的设计[M].中国科学技术协会,译.北京:科学普及出版社,2005.
  • 4National Research Council. How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom [M]. Washington, D. C. : The National Academies Press, 2005.
  • 5National Research Council. Systems for State Science Assessment [M]. Washington, D. C. : The National Academies Press, 2005.
  • 6Smhh C, Wiser M, Anderson C W, et al. Implications of Research on Children's Learning for Assessment: Matter and Atomic Molecular Theory [R]. Washington D. C. : National Academy of Sciences, 2004.
  • 7Smith C, Wiser M, Anderson C W, et al. Implications of Research on Children's Learning for Standards and Assessment: A Proposed Learning Progression for Matter and the Atomic-Molecular Theory [J]. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2006, 4(1-2): 1-98.
  • 8Catley, K. , Lehrer, R. & Reiser, R. , Tracing a Prospective Learning Progression for Developing Understanding of Evolution[R], Washington D. C.: National Academy of Sciences, 2005.
  • 9Roseman J E, Caldwell A, Gogos A, et al. Mapping a Coherent Learning Progression for the Molecular Basis of Heredity [C]. the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Meeting. San Francisco, CA, 2006.
  • 10National Research Council. Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8 [M]. Washinton, D. C. : the National Academies Press, 2006.

同被引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部