期刊文献+

国内“破五唯”政策大环境下科技期刊将如何发展 被引量:2

How to Develop Domestic Periodicals under Circumstance of Breaking Five Only
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近期受到广大学者广泛关注的关于开展清理“唯论文、唯帽子、唯职称、唯学历、唯奖项”专项行动,俗称“破五唯”,其根源在唯论文。论文是科研人员在实验基础上对自然科学等研究领域现象的科学分析、综合研究和阐述,具有学术性、创新性和科学性。各个高校和科研机构用论文来衡量科研工作者学术成就和科研成果,其出发点并无不妥。只是近年来在科技领域存在过分倚重倾向、将论文作为决定性的科研评价标准的行为,这种行为严重影响学术生态,故科学评价体系的创新和实践已经迫在眉睫。中文科技期刊要抓住机会科学谋划、精准发力,将期刊办成国内外具有重要影响的学术出版物。 Recently, the Special Action to Clean Up “Only Paper,Only Hat, Only Professional Title, Only Academic Degree and Only Award” commonly known as to break the "five only", has been widely concerned by many scholars, and its root is Only paper. Paper is a scientific analysis, comprehensive research and elaboration of phenomena in natural science and other research fields by researchers on the basis of experiments. It is academic, innovative and scientific. It is not wrong for universities and scientific research institutions to take academic paper as an indicator of scientific research evaluation. But in recent years, in the field of science and technology, there is a tendency to rely too much on the paper, the paper as the whole, only or decisive scientific research evaluation criteria, seriously affecting the academic ecology in China. It is urgent to implement the scientific evaluation system. Chinese periodicals should seize the opportunity to make scientific planning and precise efforts, so as to build periodicals with important influence at home and abroad.
作者 梁霞 王晨 LIANG Xia;WANG Chen(Journal Press of Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China)
出处 《天津科技》 2022年第11期92-95,共4页 Tianjin Science & Technology
关键词 “破五唯” 唯论文 国内期刊 评价体系 “breaking five only” paper only Chinese periodical evaluation system
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献43

  • 1李伟.刹住“SCI绝对论”之风走出科技人才和科研成果评价“怪圈”[J].中国科技投资,2020(5):30-30. 被引量:2
  • 2汪再非.学术论文对高校教师科研业绩的评价作用[J].理工高教研究,2006,25(6):18-19. 被引量:7
  • 3Oxford English Dictionary[ M ].
  • 4Leo J, Lacasse J, Cimino A. Why Does Academic Medi- cine Allow Ghostwriting? A Prescription for Reform [ J ]. SSoocciieettyy, 2011, 48 (5) : 371 - 375.
  • 5Gφtzsche PC, Hr6bjartsson A, Johansen HK, et al. Ghost Authorship in Industry -initiated Randomised Trials[ J]. PLoS Medicine, 2007,4( 1 ) : 19.
  • 6Ross JS, Hill KP, Egilman DS, Krumholz HM. Guest Au- thorship and Ghostwriting in Publications Related to Rofecox- ib : A Case Study of Industry Documents from Rofecoxib Litiga- tion[ J]. JAMA, 2008, 299 : 1800 - 1812.
  • 7Hammer G. How to Exorcise Academic Ghostwriting[ J]. The Phi Delta Kappan, 57 (5) : 328 - 330.
  • 8Agata WK. Legal and Ethical Aspects of Ghostwriting in Medicine [ J]. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapia Experimen- talis, 2011,59 ( 1 ) : 1 - 9.
  • 9McHenry L, Jureidini J. Industry - sponsored Ghostwriting in Clinical trial Reporting: A Case Study [ J ]. Account Res, 2008,15 : 152 - 167.
  • 10Moffatt B, Elliott C. Ghost Marketing: Pharmaceutical Companies and Ghostwritten Journal Articles[ J]. Perspect Bi- ol Med, 2007, 50:18 -31.

共引文献53

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部