期刊文献+

家庭环境质量对幼儿道德敏感性发展的影响:共情的中介作用 被引量:3

Effect of family environment on preschool children’moral sensitivity:The mediating role of empathy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:了解幼儿道德敏感性的发展情况,探索家庭环境对幼儿道德敏感性的影响,为幼儿道德教育提供依据。方法:以766名3~7岁幼儿为研究对象,运用问卷法调查了幼儿道德敏感性的发展现状,并就家庭环境质量、共情对道德敏感性的作用机制通过建立结构方程模型的方式进行了探讨。结果:幼儿道德敏感性的发展速度较快,3~6岁时,不同年龄段之间存在显著差异,不同道德领域也存在显著差异;家庭环境质量、共情及道德敏感性之间两两显著正相关,共情在家庭环境质量对道德敏感性的影响中起部分中介作用(χ^(2)=18.90,df=23,χ^(2)/df=0.82,CFI=0.98,TLI=0.97,NFI=0.98,RMSEA=0.01)。结论:幼儿不同领域道德敏感性随着年龄的增长而快速提高,家庭环境质量和共情共同促进幼儿道德敏感性的发展。 Objective:To describe the development of children’s moral sensitivity,explore the influence of family environment on children’s moral sensitivity,and provide basis for children’s moral education.Methods:A sample of 766 children aged 3~7 years was investigated to describe the development status of children’moral sensitivity,explore the mechanism of family environment and empathy on moral sensitivity.Results:Children’moral sensitivity developed faster,especially when they were 3~6 years old,there were significant differences between different age groups(P<0.05);There were also significant differences in different moral fields(P<0.05);The family environment,empathy and moral sensitivity of children were positively correlated;empathy played a part of the mediating role in the influence of family environment on moral sensitivity(χ^(2)=18.90,df=23,χ^(2)/df=0.82,CFI=0.98,TLI=0.97,NFI=0.98,RMSEA=0.01).Conclusion:Children’moral sensitivity in different fields increases rapidly with age,and family environment and empathy jointly promote the development of children’s moral sensitivity.
作者 杜军 DU Jun(School of Education,Longdong University,Qingyang 745000,China)
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 北大核心 2023年第1期103-110,共8页 China Journal of Health Psychology
基金 甘肃省社会科学规划项目(编号:2022YB120) 陇东学院博士基金计划项目(编号:XYBYSK2103) 陇东学院博士科研启动项目(编号:XYBY1710)。
关键词 道德敏感性 家庭环境 共情 幼儿 Moral sensitivity Family environment Empathy Children
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献37

  • 1李松.家庭环境对儿童发展影响的研究综述[J].许昌学院学报,2007,26(4):143-146. 被引量:20
  • 2Rest J R. Moral development: Advance in research and theory. New York: A division of Greeenwood Press, 1986: 2-18.
  • 3Rest J R, Narvaze D, Bebeau M J, Thoma S J. Postconvenfional moral thinking: a neo-Kohlbergian approach. New Jersey: Lawrence Ertbaum Associates Press, 1999. 101-102.
  • 4Haidt J .The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review. 2001,108 (4): 814-834.
  • 5Damasio A R, Tranel D, Damasio H. Individuals with sociopathic behavior caused by frontal damage fail to respond autonomically to social stimuli. Behavioral Brain Research, 1990, 41: 81-94.
  • 6Jorge M, Souza R, Paul J, et al. The neural correlates of moral sensitivity: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation of basic and moral emotions. Journal of Neuroscience, 2002, 22(7): 2730-2736.
  • 7Clarkebum K. A test for ethical sensitivity in science. Journal of Moral education, 2002, 31 (4): 439-453.
  • 8Narvaez D. Moral Perception: A New Construct?. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY, 1996, April 8-12.
  • 9Bredemeier D, Shields B .Applied Ethics and moral reasoning in sport. In: J.R. Rest & D. Narvaez (Eds.). Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1994. 177-184.
  • 10Wesley J E. Supervisor moral sensitivity. Counselor Education & Supervision, 2000, 40 (2): 115-127.

共引文献44

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部