期刊文献+

运用FOCUS-PDCA在急诊抢救患者中的应用

Application of find-organize-clarify-understand-select-plan-do-check-act in emergency rescue of patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨运用FOCUS-PDCA在缩短急诊抢救患者发血平均时长的成效。方法 收集2022年1月—7月医院输血科收到的急诊抢救患者用血申请单125份作为对照组;开展FOCUS-PDCA后,收集2022年8月—12月院输血科收到的急诊抢救患者用血申请单103份作为观察组。对照组按照旧的急诊用血流程,观察组采用新的急诊用血流程,记录收、发血时间截点及血型报告时间点,对2组在急诊抢救患者发血平均时长、急诊备血血型报告时长方面进行比较。结果 通过运用FOCUS-PDCA,改进急诊用血流程,急诊抢救患者发血平均时长由原来的31 min缩短至22 min,达标率为150%,进步率为29%;急诊备血血型报告平均时长由原来的139 min缩短至27 min,达标率为103%,进步率为81%,改善前后时长差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 本次运用FOCUS-PDCA改进急诊抢救患者的配血流程,有效缩短患者输血等待时间,大幅度缩短急诊备血血型报告平均时间,提高抢救成功率,持续改进有成效,提高了临床对急救用血的满意度。 Objective This paper aims to explore the effect of find-organize-clarify-understand-select-plan-do-check-act(FOCUS-PDCA)in shortening the average blood matching time for emergency patients.Methods A total of 125 blood application forms received by the blood transfusion department of our hospital from January 2022 to July 2022 were collected as the control group.After the implementation of FOCUS-PDCA,103 blood application forms received by the blood transfusion department from August 2022 to December 2022 were collected as the observation group.The control group followed the usual emergency procedure,while the observation group adopted a new emergency procedure,and the cut-off point of blood collection and blood type reporting time were recorded.The two groups were compared in terms of the average blood matching time for emergency patients and the time of blood type reporting in emergency preparation.Results By using FOCUS-PDCA,the procedure of emergency blood use was improved.The average blood matching time for emergency patients was shortened from 31 min to 22 min,with the standard reaching rate of 150%,and the improvement rate was 29%.The average reporting time of emergency blood preparation was shortened from 139 min to 27 min,with the standard reaching rate of 103%,and the improvement rate was 81%;the differences above between before and after improvement were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion FOCUS-PDCA improves the blood matching procedure for emergency patients,effectively shortens the preparation time for transfusion,significantly shorten the average time of emergency blood type report,improve the success rate of rescue,and achieve continuous improvement results,improving clinical satisfaction with emergency blood use.
作者 庞洁如 李明才 PANG Jie-ru;LI Ming-cai(Clinical Laboratory,Ningbo Sixth Hospital Affiliated to Ningbo University,Ningbo,Zhejiang 315040,China;不详)
出处 《中国卫生检验杂志》 CAS 2023年第19期2402-2404,共3页 Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
关键词 FOCUS-PDCA 急诊 输血 持续性改进 Find-organize-clarify-understand-select-plan-do-check-act Emergency Blood transfusion Continuous improvement
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献140

  • 1金燕萍,江铭,贾方明.微柱凝胶技术在临床安全输血中的应用[J].诊断学理论与实践,2019,0(6):672-675. 被引量:24
  • 2Grosso S, Bruschetta G, De Rosa R,et al. Improving the efficiency and efficacy of pre analytical and analytical work-flow of urine cultures with urinary flow cytometry[J].New Microbiol, 2008, 31 (4):501-505.
  • 3Walsh PC.Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy.In:Walsh PC,Retik AB,Vaughan ED,et al.eds.Campbell 's Urology,8th ed.Philadelphia:Saunders,2002.3107.
  • 4Walsh PC,Donker PJ.Impotence following radical prostatectomy:insight into etiology and prevention.J Urol,1982,128:492-497.
  • 5Bader P,Burkhard FC,Markwalder R,et al.Is a limited lymgh node dissection an adequate staging procedure for prostate cancer? J Urol,2002,168:514-518.
  • 6Steele GS,Richie JP.Avoiding positive margins in prostate cancer surgery.Contemporary Urology,1998,10:74-93.
  • 7Shah O,Melamed J,Lepor H.Analysis of apical soft tissue margins during radical retropubic prostatectomy.J Urol,2001,165:1943-1949.
  • 8招伟贤,黎涌.备血不足手术大量失血的应急策略[J].中国输血杂志,2008,21(4):327-328. 被引量:9
  • 9邓德耀,李增安,黄红兵,周林华,支国华,薛云松,冯倩,黄敏.影响实验室生化结果回报时间的因素探讨[J].中国实验诊断学,2008,12(9):1136-1138. 被引量:12
  • 10宋昊岚,张水香,彭志英.生化检验的报告时间分析[J].现代检验医学杂志,2008,23(5):72-75. 被引量:26

共引文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部