期刊文献+

心理健康促进量表的汉化及在护理人员中的信效度检验 被引量:3

Translation and validation of the Mental Health Promotion Scale in nursing staff
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对心理健康促进量表(Mental Health Promotion Scale,MHPS)进行汉化,并在护理人员中检验其信效度。方法依照Brislin翻译模式对英文版量表进行翻译、回译、文化调适和预调查,形成中文版MHPS。2022年12月至2023年4月,选取959名临床护士展开问卷调查,评价量表的信效度。结果中文版MHPS探索性因子分析提取12个公因子,累计方差贡献率为74.634%;其条目水平内容效度指数(I-CVI)0.900~1.000,量表水平内容效度指数(S-CVI/Ave)为0.996。验证性因子分析显示,模型各项指标均达标准,模型拟合度良好。量表总的Cronbach′sα系数为0.961,重测信度为0.888,Spearman-Brown折半信度系数为0.889。结论中文版MHPS量表的信效度良好,可作为我国护理人员心理健康促进能力的测评工具。 Objective To translate the Mental Health Promotion Scale(MHPS)into Chinese,and to test its reliability and validity among nursing staff.Methods According to the Brislin translation model,the English scale was translated,back translated,cultu-rally adjusted and subjected to a pilot survey to form the Chinese MHPS.From December 2022 to April 2023,959 clinical nurses were selected to participate in a questionnaire survey to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale.Results The Chinese version MHPS included 12 dimensions and 39 items,and the I-CVI of each item was between 0.900 and 1.000,and the S-CVI/Ave of the scale was 0.996.Twelve common factors were extracted from exploratory factor analysis,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 74.634%.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that all indexes of the model could meet the standard,and the model fitted well.The total Cronbach′sαcoefficient of the scale was 0.961,the retest reliability was 0.888,and the split-half Spearman-Brown coefficient reliability was 0.889.Conclusion The Chinese version of MHPS has good reliability and validity,and can be used as an evaluation tool for mental health promotion ability of nursing staff in China.
作者 侯荣春 付军桦 魏华 张雯雯 卜娜 冷敏 Hou Rongchun;Fu Junhua;Wei Hua;Zhang Wenwen;Bu Na;Leng Min(School of Nursing,Qingdao University,Qingdao 266011,China)
出处 《护理学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2023年第19期86-90,共5页 Journal of Nursing Science
基金 青岛大学附属医院临床医学+X科研面上项目(QDFY+X202101022) 山东省医务职工科技创新计划项目(202117)。
关键词 护士 心理健康促进 量表 价值观 自尊 应对压力 自我认知 信度 效度 nurses mental health promotion scale values self-respect coping with stress self-recognition reliabi-lity validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献80

  • 1李灿,辛玲.调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J].中国卫生统计,2008,25(5):541-544. 被引量:476
  • 2刘华山.心理健康概念与标准的再认识[J].心理科学,2001,24(4):481-481. 被引量:279
  • 3张里程,汪宏,王禄生,萧庆伦.中国西部农村居民健康相关生命质量研究[J].中国卫生经济,2005,24(3):8-11. 被引量:55
  • 4Denise FP. Essenlials of nursing research:appraising evidence for nursing practice[M]. 7th ed. Philadephia: Wohers Kluwer Lippincott Williams&Wilkins, 2008:372-380.
  • 5Maria D,Rhidian H,Julia M,et al. Translating clinical Iools in nursing practice[J]. J Adv Nurs,2003,44(4) :420-426.
  • 6汪东向,王希林.马弘.心理卫生评定手册(增订版)[M].北京:中同心理卫生杂志社.1999.
  • 7Guillemin F,Bumbardier C,Beaton D. Crosultural adaptation of heahh-re- lated quality of' lifemeasures:literature review and proposed guidelines [J ].Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46(12) : 1417-1432.
  • 8International Council of Nurses(ICN). Translation guidelines lor iolerna- tional classification for nursing practice(ICNP)[M]. Geneva: lmprimerie ' Fornara,2008 : 1-16.
  • 9Huang TY,Moser DK,Hsieh YS,et al. Validation of Chinese version oftilethe Modified pulanhtars Fumctionstl Status and Dyspnea Questionnstinwith heart Litere patietas in Taiwan J .Vn tane ,2008.17.5:436-442.
  • 10Flaherly JA,Gavilia M,Pathak D,et al. Developing instruments for cross- cultural psychiatric research [ J]. J Nerv Ment Dis, 1988,176(20):257- 263.

共引文献1802

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部