期刊文献+

基于多准则决策分析的中医医疗技术综合评价指标体系构建研究 被引量:4

Research on the Construction of Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Traditional Non-Pharmacological Technology Based on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:为科学推进中医适宜技术遴选等工作,基于卫生技术评估和多准则决策分析理论,构建符合中医药特点的中医医疗技术价值评估指标体系。方法:通过文献综述初步形成评价指标池,通过半结构式访谈和德尔菲法进一步完善评价指标。结果:形成了包括质量标准、安全性、有效性、经济性、传承创新、适宜性和可及性7个维度的中医医疗技术价值评价指标,内含17个二级指标和33个三级指标。问卷回收率为100%,17名专家的群体权威系数为0.87,一级指标的专家意见集中度和协调度较高。结论:本研究构建的指标池专家权威度高、专家意见集中度和协调度较好,对中医医疗技术价值评价具有重要意义。 Objective:In order to scientifically promote the selection of appropriate technology of traditional non-pharmacologi-cal,the value evaluation index system of traditional non-pharmacological technology was constructed in line with the characteristics of TCM based on the theory of health technology assessment and multi-criteria decision analysis.Methods:The evaluation index pool was initially formed through literature research,and then those indicators were further improved through semi-structured inter-views and Delphi method.Results:The value evaluation index was constructed with seven dimensions,including quality standard,safety,effectiveness,economy,inheritance and innovation,suitability and accessibility,which were subordinated by 17 second-level indicators and 33 third-level indicators.The questionnaire response rate was 100%.The group authority coefficient of 17 experts was 0.87,and the concentration and coordination degree of expert opinions of the first-level indicators were high.Conclusion:The index pool constructed in this study has high expert authority,good concentration and coordination of expert opinions,which needs to be verified by practical experience,which is of great significance for the value evaluation of traditional non-pharmacological technology.
作者 艾丹丹 隋宾艳 段承阿鑫 许倩 赵琨 Ai Dandan;Sui Binyan;Duan Cheng’axin;Xu Qing;Zhao Kun(Beijing Health Economic Association,Beijing,100053,China;不详)
出处 《中国卫生经济》 北大核心 2023年第12期81-87,共7页 Chinese Health Economics
关键词 中医医疗技术 价值评估 多准则决策分析 卫生技术评估 traditional non-pharmacological technology value assessment multi-criteria decision analysis health technology assessmen
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

共引文献57

同被引文献39

引证文献4

;
使用帮助 返回顶部