经脐单孔腹腔镜联合输尿管镜与传统腹腔镜治疗中上段输尿管狭窄的临床疗效比较

Clinical efficacy of transumbilical single-port laparoscopy combined with ureteroscopy versus conventional laparoscopy in the treatment of upper and middle ureteral stenosis

目的:探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜联合输尿管镜治疗中上段输尿管狭窄的可行性及术后疗效观察。方法:回顾性分析2020年4月—2022年3月南方医科大学第三附属医院收治的35例因输尿管狭窄行输尿管狭窄段切除后再吻合术患者的临床资料。其中单孔腹腔镜联合输尿管镜组患者25例,传统腹腔镜组10例。术中采用斜卧截石位,单孔腹腔镜联合输尿管镜组手术采用脐部约3 cm切口,放置四通道单孔穿刺套件,用于放置腹腔镜观察孔及操作孔,术中根据输尿管镜精准定位输尿管狭窄段及留置输尿管内支架管。与传统腹腔镜组比较分析相关手术指标、术后并发症、患者满意度等临床数据。结果:所有患者均顺利完成手术,单孔腹腔镜联合输尿管镜组术中无增加辅助孔或改开放手术,单孔腹腔镜联合输尿管镜组平均手术时间(125.41±42.07)min,术后平均住院时间为(7.67±3.42)d,与传统腹腔镜组比较差异无统计学意义。2组患者围手术期无明显并发症发生,随访1年以上,患者肾积水较前减轻,肾功能得以改善。此外,单孔腹腔镜联合输尿管镜组部分不留置术腔引流管,患者手术切口美观,满意度好。结论:单孔腹腔镜联合输尿管镜治疗输尿管中上段狭窄是安全可行的,并且具有术后恢复快、美容效果好等优势。对于具有一定腹腔镜技术经验的术者是一种临床可选择的手术方式。

Objective: To explore the feasibility and postoperative efficacy of transumbilical single port laparoscopy combined with ureteroscopy in the treatment of upper and middle ureteral stenosis. Methods: The case data of 35 patients admitted to our hospital from April 2020 to March 2022 for ureteral stenosis who underwent ureteral stenosis segment resection followed by reanastomosis were retrospectively analyzed. There were 25 patients in the single-port laparoscopy combined with ureteroscopy group and 10 patients in the conventional laparoscopy group. The operation was performed in a reclined lithotomy position, and the single-port laparoscopy group was operated with an umbilical incision of about 3 cm. A four-channel single-port puncture kit was used for placing the laparoscopic observation holes and operation holes, and the ureteral stents were precisely localized according to the ureteroscopy and left in place. Clinical data such as relevant surgical indexes, postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction were analyzed in comparison with the traditional laparoscopic group. Results: All patients were successfully completed the operation, and patients in the single-port laparoscopic group didn't experience intraoperative additional auxiliary holes or conversion to open surgery. The operation time of the single-port laparoscopic group was(125.41±42.07) min, and the length of postoperative hospitalization was(7.67±3.42) d. The differences were not statistically significant when comparing with those of the traditional laparoscopic group. There were no obvious complications during the perioperative period in the two groups. After more than 1 year of follow-up period, the patients' hydronephrosis was reduced, and the renal function was improved. In addition, postoperative drainage tubes weren't indwelt in some of the patients in the single-port laparoscopic group, and the patients' surgical incisions were beautiful and satisfactory. Conclusion: Single-port laparoscopy combined with ureteroscopy is safe and feasible for the treatment of upper and middle ureteral stenosis and has the advantages of fast postoperative recovery and good cosmetic results. It is a clinical option for operators with some experience in laparoscopic techniques.