摘要
政府采购行政裁决被试点用于处理政府采购投诉,借助财政部门对政府采购监督管理职能,很好地解决了政府采购中的各种争议。现行法律制度下,可以对行政裁决提出行政复议和行政诉讼,使裁决机构面临着被司法机关审查的情况,与通常情况下裁决机构不成为司法审查对象的行政裁决机制设计不相符。为充分发挥政府采购行政裁决的职能,有必要将政府采购行政裁决机制的职能定位为处理平等主体间政府采购合同订立及履行纠纷的程序,完善其调解、处理损害赔偿纠纷等各种功能,逐步向着准司法化的方向予以改革,完成政府采购行政裁决程序与司法裁判程序的直接衔接。将政府采购监督检查职能、与行政合法性相关的举报投诉处理工作及行政处罚工作与行政裁决相区分,在行政裁决之后取消行政复议,不将行政裁决机关作为司法裁决程序的被告,优先适用民事诉讼程序处理不服政府采购行政裁决的诉讼,延长行政裁决的期限,赋予行政裁决结果的可强制执行性,推动提升政府采购行政裁决的专业性和权威性。
The administrative adjudication of government procurement has been piloted to deal with government procurement complaints.With the help of the supervision and management function of the financial department,various disputes in government procurement have been well resolved.Under the current legal system,administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation can be brought against administrative adjudication decision,which makes the adjudication body face the situation of being reviewed by judicial organs,which is inconsistent with the design of administrative adjudication mechanism that the adjudication body does not become the object of judicial review under normal circumstances.In order to give full play to the function of administrative adjudication of government procurement,it is necessary to define the function of administrative adjudication mechanism of government procurement as the procedure for dealing with disputes over the conclusion and performance of government procurement contracts among equal subjects,improve its mediation,deal with damages disputes and other functions,gradually towards the direction of quasi-judicial reform,and complete the direct connection between the administrative adjudication procedure of government procurement and the judicial adjudication procedure.Distinguish the supervision and inspection functions of government procurement,the handling of public tip-offs and complaints related to administrative legitimacy and administrative punishment from administrative adjudication,cancel the administrative reconsideration after the administrative adjudication,do not take the administrative adjudication body as the defendant of the judicial procedure,give priority to the civil litigation procedure to deal with the litigation against the administrative decision of government procurement,extend the time limit of the administrative adjudication procedure,and make the administrative procedure decision enforceable to promote the professionalism and authority of administrative adjudication of government procurement.
作者
焦洪宝
JIAO Hong-bao(School of International Relations,Tianjin Foreign Studies University,Tianjin 300270,China)
出处
《政法学刊》
2024年第1期56-66,共11页
Journal of Political Science and Law
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“政府与社会资本合作项目争端解决机制研究”(18YJA820006)。
关键词
政府采购
行政裁决
投诉处理
争议解决
Government Procurement
Administrative Adjudication
Complaint Handling
Dispute Resolution