期刊文献+

CEO薪酬与企业业绩互动效应的实证检验 被引量:216

An empirical study on the mutual effect between CEO's pay and the firm's performance
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文利用逐步回归和路径分析方法 ,检验了我国上市公司CEO薪酬的激励制约机制和激励制约效果。结果发现 :(1)决定CEO薪酬增长的因素主要是营业利润率变动 ,决定CEO薪酬下降的因素则主要是总资产净利率变动 ,这表明在我国上市公司的CEO薪酬层面已体现了一定的激励制约机制 ;(2 )增加CEO薪酬对提高企业的规模和股东财富均有一定的促进作用 ,但降低CEO薪酬却不仅不能提高企业规模和股东财富 ,反而会对其产生一定的负面影响 ,这不仅说明CEO薪酬也具有“工资刚性”特征 ,而且说明我国上市公司的CEO薪酬也仅有单方面的激励效果 ,而没有预期的制约效果 ;(3)无论是增加或降低CEO薪酬 ,CEO均不存在盈余管理或利润操纵的机会主义行为 ,这表明CEO进行盈余管理或利润操纵的动机不应该是为了增加其公开性薪酬 ,而应该是居于除公开性薪酬以外的其他目的。 This paper aims to analyze the effect of the incentive and restrictive mechanisms,which lies in the CEOs pay contract in Chinese listed firms.Stepwise regression and root analysis methods are adopted in our empirical study.Our research proves:(1)Operating profit is the major factor to influence the increasing of CEOs pay,while the declining of CEOs pay is decided by the return ratio on total assets,this result shows that the incentive and restrictive mechanism of the CEOs pay contract is effective in some extent;(2) To increase the CEOs pay leads to the expanding of firms size and stock-holders wealth in some degree,however,the declining of CEOs pay has negative effect on the above two,this result shows that the CEOs pay has rigid characteristic.Moreover,the CEOs pay contract has incentive effect,but has no expected restrict effect;(3)Whether the increasing or declining the CEOs pay,it isnt obvious relationship with the earning management,therefore,the earning management isnt for increasing the CEOs pay.
出处 《会计研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第3期35-39,共5页 Accounting Research
基金 国家自然科学基金"非对称信息下的公司资本结构优化理论与选择机制研究" (批准号 :79970 0 73 )项目 香港政府科学研究基金"AStudyoftheAssociationbetweenCulturalDimensionsandAspectsofAccountingCommunica tionandFinancialEvaluation"项目的阶段性研究成果之一
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Bentson G. 1985. The self-serving management hypothesis: Some evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics,7:67-84.
  • 2Carroll T. and Ciscel D.. 1982. The effects of regulation on executive compensation. Review of Economics and Statistics,64:505-509.
  • 3Chan H. S. 1994. Agency Problem and Bureaucratic Governance in the People's Republic of China.INT' L, J. OF PUB. ADMIN., 17 (9): 1631-1662.
  • 4Ciscel D. H. 1974. Determinants of Executive Compensation.Southern Economic Journal,V40:613-617.
  • 5Ciscel D. and Carroll T. 1980. The determinants of executive salaries: An econometric survey. Review of Economies and Statistics, 62:7-13.
  • 6Culpan R. Murti V. N. and Culpan O. 1992. Determinants of CEO Pay in Service Industry Firms. Croup & Organization Management, Volume 17 No. 2:210-217.
  • 7Crystal G. S. 1992. CEO Pay: Hew Much is Enough?. Harvard Business Review, July - August: 130-139.
  • 8Finkelstein S. and Hambrick, D.. 1989. Chief executive compensation: A study of the intersection of markets and political processes. Strategic Management Journal, 10:121-134.
  • 9Hirachey M.and Pappas J. 1981.Regulatory and life cycle influences on managerial incentives.Southem Eomomic Journal,48:327-334.
  • 10Jensen M. C. and Murphy K. J. 1990. CEO Incentives- It's Not How Much You Pay, But How. Havard Business Review, May - June: 138-153.

同被引文献2263

引证文献216

二级引证文献4578

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部