摘要
《刑法》第287条之二规定的帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪虽然以独立条文的形式出现,但其所表现的立法其实与其说是'共犯正犯化',不如说是'从犯的主犯化'。以法条为根据,我国共同体系与单一正犯制更加亲融,但单一正犯制不意味着必然采取共犯独立性,在单一正犯制下对共犯从属性仍可进行扬弃。'情节严重'是限制帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪处罚范围的有效路径,在罪名适用上由于第287条之二第3款的规定,帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪更多的是起着依托刑量进行量刑反制定罪的作用。
Though Crime of Assisting in Information Network Criminal Activities is stipulated independently as Article 287b in the Crime Code,the tendency it shows shall be interpreted as accomplice turning principal criminal rather than accomplice turning perpetrator.According to the provisions of Section 3,Joint Crimes,Crime Code,system of Joint Crimes enjoys a more harmony relationship with unitary perpetrator,but unitary perpetrator isn’t meant to choose complicity independence,which means we could sublate complicity dependence on the basis of unitary perpetrator.”which involve serious circumstances”shall be treated as effective method to limit punishment scope.According to the third provision in Article 287b,Crime of Assisting in Information Network Criminal Activities plays role in prohibiting crimes through penalties.
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“涉信息网络违法犯罪行为法律规制研究”(14ZDB147)
2016年度上海市哲学社会科学规划一般课题“信息网络技术服务的刑事规制研究”的阶段性成果
关键词
帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪
从犯主犯化
限制从属
处罚范围
Crime of Assisting in Information Network Criminal Activities
Tendency of Accomplice Turning Principal Criminal
Restricted Subordinate of Complicity
Punishment Range