期刊文献+

构式在中国学生英语句子意义理解中的作用 被引量:79

Constructions in the comprehension of English sentences by Chinese EFL learners
原文传递
导出
摘要 在句子意义理解过程中 ,传统的观点认为动词决定句子的句法和意义 ,而Bencini&Goldberg( 2 0 0 0 )通过两个分类法的实验 ,指出论元构式在决定句子整体意义方面比动词具有更强的预测能力。在前人研究基础上 ,本研究试图引进语言水平这一参数 ,考察动词和论元构式在二语句子意义理解中的作用。实验材料参照Bencini&Goldberg ,由 4个英语动词和 4个构式交叉组成 1 6个英语句子 ,三种不同英语语言水平的受试依据自己对句子整体意义的理解对它们进行归类。结果表明 ,受试的分类随着语言水平的不同而呈现不同的倾向 ,即初学者更容易受动词的影响 ,而中级和高级水平的学习者则倾向于依据论元构式来理解句子意义。 This paper investigated, by the sorting paradigm, the role of verbs or constructions when Chinese EFL learners try to understand an English sentence. Sixteen sentences were created by crossing four verbs with four constructions and subjects of different language proficiencies were asked to sort them into four groups according to their overall meaning. The results suggest that in an L2 context, language proficiency makes a difference on the main determinants of sentence meaning. That is, EFL beginners rely more on the verb in sentence interpretation, while intermediate and advanced learners are more influenced by the construction of a sentence.
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第1期42-48,共7页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基金 教育部人文社科"十五"规划资助( 0 1JC74 0 0 0 1)
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Bencini, G. & A. Goldberg. 2000. The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning [J ]. Journal of Memory and Language 43: 640- 651.
  • 2Boland, J. E. & H. Boehm-Jernigan. 1998. Lexical constraints and prepositional phrase attachment [J ]. Journal of Memory and Language 39: 684-719.
  • 3Fillmore, C. J., P. Kay & M. C. O'Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone [J]. Language 64:501- 538.
  • 4Garnsey, S. M., N.J. Pearlmutter, E. Meyers & M. A. Lotocky. 1997. The contribution of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences [ J ]. Journal of Memory of Language 37: 58-93.
  • 5Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure [ M ]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 6Goldberg, A. 2001. Patient arguments of causative verbs can be omitted: The role of information structure in argument distribution [J]. Language Sciences 34/4- 5: 503-524.
  • 7Goldberg, A., D. Casenhiser & N. Sethuraman. 2001. Learning Argument Structure Generalizations. To appear.
  • 8Healy, A. & D. Miller. 1970. The verb as the main de terminant of sentence meaning [ J ]. Psychonomic Science 20: 372.
  • 9Kay, P. 1995. Construction grammar [A]. In Jef Ver schueren, Jan-Ola Ostman & J. Blommaert (eds.). Handbook of Pragmatics [ C ]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 171-177.
  • 10Landauer, T. & S. Dumais. 1997. A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of ac quisition, induction, and representation of knowledge [J]. Psychological Review 104:211-240.

二级参考文献26

  • 1沈家煊.说“偷”和“抢”[J].语言教学与研究,2000(1):19-24. 被引量:75
  • 2沈家煊.“在”字句和“给”字句[J].中国语文,1999(2):94-102. 被引量:237
  • 3张伯江.论“把”字句的句式语义[J].语言研究,2000,20(1):28-40. 被引量:305
  • 4Fillmore, C., P. Kay, A. Kathol, & L. Michaelis. Construction grammar (Unpublished Manuscript). University of California, Berkeley.
  • 5Fillmore, C., P. Kay, & M. O'Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of LET ALONE.Language 64: 501-38.
  • 6Goldberg, A. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • 7Goldberg, A. 1997. The relationships between verbs and constructions. In Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction ofMeaning, eds. M. Verspoor, K Lee & E. Sweetser, pp383-398. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • 8Goldberg, A. 1997. Construction grammar. In Concise encyclopedia of syntactic theories, eds. Brown & Miller. Elsevier Science Limited.
  • 9Goldberg, A. E. 1998. The emergence of the semantics of argument structure constructions. In The Emergence of Language, ed. B.MacWhinny, pp197-212. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • 10Goldberg, A. 2001. Patient arguments of causative verbs can be omitted: The role of information structure in argument distribution.Language Science 34: 503-524.

共引文献174

同被引文献746

引证文献79

二级引证文献522

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部