期刊文献+

对萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说的反思 被引量:14

Reflections on the Sapir—Whorf Hypothesis ——From the Philosophical and Psychological Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从哲学及心理学的角度对萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说及其众多解释的分析表明了假说本身的隐晦及语言学者们对假说理解的不足。在此基础上进行反思提出了较萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说更为合理的解释。 By analyzing the Sapir—Whorf hypothesis and its various explanations from philosophical and psychological perspective, the author points out the obscurity of the hypothesis itself and the misunderstanding of many linguists. Based on the reflection, the author proposes a more reasonable interpretation.
作者 罗荣
出处 《湘潭师范学院学报(社会科学版)》 2004年第1期10-12,共3页 Journal of Xiangtan Normal University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 萨丕尔-沃尔夫假说 哲学 心理学 语言学 思维科学 hypothesis philosophy psychology reflection
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献30

  • 1洪堡特翻译散记[J].外语教学与研究,1998,30(3):65-69. 被引量:3
  • 2何叶耳,余学迟.人类语言学[J].当代语言学,1963(2):17-24. 被引量:1
  • 3陈中竺.批评语言学述评[J].外语教学与研究,1995,27(1):21-27. 被引量:193
  • 4高一虹.沃尔夫假说的“言外行为”与“言后行为”[J].外语教学与研究,2000,32(3):182-189. 被引量:56
  • 5Gumperz, J. & Levinson, S. (eds.) 1996. Rethinking Linguistic Relativity,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Haugen, J. 1977. Linguistic relativity: Myths and Methods. In McCormack, W., et al(eds.) Language and Thought: Anthropological Issues. (13) The Hague: Mouton.
  • 7Hudson, R. A. 1996. Sociolinguistics (2nd Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge universityPress, 95-101.
  • 8Lucy, J. 1996. The scope of linguistic relativity: An analysis and review ofempirical research. In Gumperz, J. & Levinson, S. (eds.) 37-69.
  • 9Slobin, D. 1996. From "thought and language" to "thinking forspeaking". In Gumperz, J. & Levinson, S. (eds.) (70-96).
  • 10Sapir, E. 1921. Language:An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York:Harcourt Brace and Company.

共引文献100

同被引文献56

引证文献14

二级引证文献31

;
使用帮助 返回顶部