摘要
在国际投资仲裁中,关于腐败的证明标准存在不同的理论观点和实践,包括排除合理怀疑、清晰而令人信服、优势证据、初步证据案件以及自由裁量等标准。国际投资仲裁中的腐败问题应当适用优势证据标准,同时可以灵活运用间接证据并结合不利推定予以认定。"一带一路"倡议落实过程中,我国政府和企业应重视腐败包括国际投资仲裁中腐败的证明标准问题。
As for standard of proof for corruption in international investment arbitration,there exist different opinions and practices,such as beyond any doubt,clear and convincing,preponderance of evidence,prima facie and discretion.The standard of preponderance of evidence should be applied for corruption in international investment arbitration,and circumstantial evidence could be used to find the truth,in combination with adverse inference.During the course of OBOR implementation,the government and enterprises of China should pay much attention to the issues of corruption including its standard of proof in international investment arbitration.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2021年第4期31-41,共11页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
基金
浙江省社会科学规划项目(项目编号:18NDJC090YB)的阶段性成果
关键词
国际投资仲裁
腐败
证明标准
间接证据
“一带一路”倡议
international investment arbitration
corruption
standard of proof
circumstantial evidence
OBOR initiative