期刊文献+

复合微生态制剂对肉鸡生产性能、肠道菌群、抗氧化指标和免疫功能的影响 被引量:50

Effects of Compound Probiotics on Performance,Intestinal Microflora, Antioxidant Indices and Immune Function of Broilers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本试验旨在探讨复合微生态制剂对肉鸡生产性能、肠道菌群、抗氧化指标和免疫功能的影响。将240只1日龄雌性健康肉鸡随机分为4组,每组3个重复,每个重复20只。试验预试期5 d,Ⅰ组为对照组,饲喂基础饲粮;Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ组为试验组,在饲喂基础饲粮同时,分别定时在饮水中添加复合微生态制剂A及其佐剂B,其中复合微生态制剂A的添加水平为饲粮的2.0‰,6日龄时开始添加,每周2次,每次饮用量为周采食量2.0‰的1/2;复合微生态制剂佐剂B在7、14和21日龄免疫后分别连续使用3 d,每天1次,每次饮用量为日采食量的0.5‰、1.0‰和2.0‰。正试期为37 d。测定各组生产性能、肠道菌群数量、抗氧化指标和免疫指标。结果表明:1)在每个试验阶段,Ⅱ组肉鸡平均日增重均显著高于对照组(P<0.05),料重比均显著低于对照组(P<0.05),且除7~14日龄和15~21日龄料重比外,Ⅱ组肉鸡平均日增重最高,料重比最低,与其他组差异显著(P<0.05)。2)14日龄和28日龄时,Ⅱ组和Ⅲ组肉鸡盲肠乳酸菌数量均显著高于对照组(P<0.05);14日龄时,Ⅱ组和Ⅲ组肉鸡盲肠大肠杆菌数量均显著低于对照组(P<0.05),28日龄时,仅Ⅱ组肉鸡盲肠大肠杆菌数量显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。3)21、28和35日龄时,Ⅱ组和Ⅲ组肉鸡血浆总抗氧化能力均显著高于对照组(P<0.05),2组之间差异不显著(P>0.05)。4)14日龄和42日龄时,Ⅳ组肉鸡的脾脏指数最高,均显著高于对照组(P<0.05);14、28和42日龄时,Ⅲ组肉鸡的法氏囊指数均较高,显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。由此可知,2.0‰复合微生态制剂A和0.5‰复合微生态制剂佐剂B能够提高肉鸡生产性能,改善其肠道微生态环境,提高其抗氧化能力。同时,复合微生态制剂及其佐剂的添加可在一定程度上增强肉鸡免疫功能。 This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of compound probiotics on the performance,intestinal microflora,antioxidant indices and immune function of broilers.Two hundred and forty 1-day-old famale broiler chickens were randomly divided into 4 groups with 3 replicates in each group and 20 chickens per replicate.The chickens in the control group(group Ⅰ) were fed a basal diet,and those in other groups(groups Ⅱ,Ⅲ and Ⅳ) were fed the basal diet and drank the water with compound probiotics A and its adjuvant B in different levels.From 6 days of age,compound probiotics A of 2.0‰ diets was supplemented twice a week(half of 2.0‰ of weekly feed intake at a time),and adjuvant B was supplemented for successive 3 days(once a day) after immunization at 7,14 and 21 days of age,respectively,and the supplemental level of adjuvant B was 0.5‰,1.0‰ and 2.0‰ of daily feed intake of broilers,respectively.The pre-trial period lasted for 5 days,and the experiment lasted for 37 days.Performance,intestinal microflora,antioxidant and immune indices were determined in different periods.The results showed as follows: 1) in every test period,compared with the control group,the average daily gain of broilers in group Ⅱ was significantly higher(P<0.05),and feed/gain(F/G) was significantly lower(P<0.05);except F/G at 7 to 14 days and 15 to 21 days,the average daily gain and F/G of broilers in group Ⅱ were significantly better than those in the other groups(P<0.05).2) The number of cecal Lactobacillus of broilers aged 14 and 28 days in groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05);the number of cecal E.coli of broilers aged 14 days in groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05);for 28-day-old broilers,only the number of cecal E.coli in group Ⅱ was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).3) The total antioxidant capacity in plasma of broilers aged 21,28 and 35 days in groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference between group Ⅱ and group Ⅲ(P>0.05).4) The spleen index of broilers aged 14 and 42 days in group Ⅳ was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05);the bursa of Fabricius index of broilers aged 14,28 and 42 days in group Ⅲ was higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).In conclusion,the supplementation of 2.0‰ compound probiotics A and 0.5‰ adjuvant B can improve performance,gain a better cecal micro-ecosystem,and enhance the antioxidant function of broilers.Meanwhile,the supplementation of compound probiotics and its adjuvant can improve the immune function of broilers to some degree.
出处 《动物营养学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期334-341,共8页 CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANIMAL NUTRITION
关键词 复合微生态制剂 肉鸡 生产性能 肠道菌群 抗氧化指标 免疫功能 compound probiotics broilers performance intestinal microflora antioxidant indices immune function
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献133

共引文献445

同被引文献629

引证文献50

二级引证文献452

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部