摘要
挪用公物的行为不应按挪用公款罪处罚,但应将该类行为犯罪化,改挪用公款罪为挪用公共财物罪;“挪用行为”本身就包含个人使用的含义,立法中规定“归个人使用”与“挪用公款”存在语义重复的问题,是导致对“归个人使用”看法不一的根源;集体决定下的挪用行为是否构成挪用公款罪不能一概而论,应具体情况具体分析;有身份者与无身份者共同挪用公款应从身份犯定。
Embezzling public belongings shouldn’t be punished as embezzlement crime, but the behaviour should be regarded as a kind of crime, so embezzlement should be changed into embezzling public belongings and public money; The behaviour of embezzlement includes personal use, there exists semantic repetition between personal use and embezzling public money in legislation, which is the source of different views on person use; collectivity’s embezzlement should be accordingly analysed; If identity and no-identity embezzle public money collectively , crime should be judged according to identity.
出处
《北方论丛》
北大核心
2005年第4期149-152,共4页
The Northern Forum