摘要
应用美军标试验方法1019.5和1019.4分别对两种典型(ComplementaryMetal?Oxide?SemiconductorTransistor,CMOS)器件进行试验验证,论述了试验原理,对试验现象进行了详细的分析,了解实验室条件下评估空间氧化物陷阱电荷和界面陷阱电荷的可行性和保守性。实验表明,两种不同工艺的CC4069器件没有通过1019.5所做出的试验验证,从实验现象观察认为是由于界面陷阱电荷大量建立所引起的。加固LC4007?RHANMOS却通过了与1019.5相比过分保守的1019.4的试验验证。
MIL STD 883 Test Method 1019.5 and 1019.4 are respectively applied to test and validate typical CMOS devices of CC4069 (manufactured in two different technologies) and LC4007-RHA. Principles for the tests are given and test results are analyzed in detail, so as to realize under laboratory conditions the feasibilities and conservatisms of eatimating oxide trap charges and interface trap charges in space. The studies shows that, while the LC4007-RHA NMOS device passed the comparatively conservative 1019.4 tests, CC4069 devices failed in the 1019.5 tests, suggesting considerable interface trap charge build-up after high temperature annealing.
出处
《辐射研究与辐射工艺学报》
EI
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2005年第4期241-245,共5页
Journal of Radiation Research and Radiation Processing
基金
国防预研基金(413110705)资助
关键词
美军标1019.5
互补型金属氧化物半导体器件
辐射效应评估
MIL-STD-883 Test Method 1019.5, Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Transistor(CMOS) device, Radiation effect estimatiom