摘要
汉武帝时淮南王刘安作的是《离骚传》还是《离骚傅》,历来颇有争议。本文对王逸《楚辞章句》提供的材料进行了细致分析,并结合其他史料,论证了淮南王所作为《离骚传》的合理性和可能性。尹湾汉简《神乌傅》的出土并不能证明刘安所作就是《离骚傅》。这一事例提醒我们应以科学和谨慎的态度对待出土文献与传世文献。
There have been many disputes on the work of Liuan, the king of Huainan state in the reign of Hanwu emperor. Was it an annotation work of the Chu Poems Lisao or a lyric ode concerning it? After careful analyses of the materials in Wangyi(王逸)'s Chucizhangju(楚辞章句), the author argues that the work was Lisaozhuan should be more reasonable and convincing. The found of Shenwufu(神乌傅) written on the Yinwan(尹湾) western Han bamboo clips couldn't support the view that Liuan's work was an ode on Lisao. This case reminds us that we should be more prudent in dealing with unearthed materials and traditional documents.
出处
《古籍整理研究学刊》
2006年第6期12-15,共4页
Journal of Ancient Books Collation and Studies
关键词
淮南王
刘安
离骚
the king ofHuainan
Liuan
Lisao