期刊文献+

Integrated Futures for Europe’s Mountain Regions: Reconciling Biodiversity Conservation and Human Livelihoods 被引量:4

Integrated Futures for Europe’s Mountain Regions: Reconciling Biodiversity Conservation and Human Livelihoods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Europe's mountains cover nearly half of the continent's area and are home to one fifth of the European population. Mountain areas are hotspots of biodiversity and agriculture has played a multifunctional role in defining and sustaining mountain biodiversity. Ongoing trends of agricultural decline are having negative impacts on mountain biodiversity. This paper presents results from an interdisciplinary European research project, BioScene, which investigated the relationship between agriculture and biodiversity in six mountain study areas across Europe to provide recommendations for reconciling biodiversity conservation with social and economic activities through an integrated rural development strategy. BioScene used scenario analysis and stakeholder participation as tools for structuring the analysis of alternative mountain futures. Three main BioScene scenarios were evaluated: Business as Usual (BAIT), Agricultural Liberalisation (Lib), Managed Change for Biodiversity (MCB). BioScene brought together ecologists, economists, sociologists and rural geogra- phers, to carry out interdisciplinary analysis of the scenarios: identifying key drivers of change, assessing the biodiversity consequences and evaluating costeffectiveness. BioScene used a sustainability assessment to integrate the research outputs across natural and social science disciplines to assess the broader sustainability of the scenarios in terms of biodiversity, natural resources, rural development, social development, economic development and institutional capacity. The sustainability assessment showed that the MCB scenario was potentially the most sustainable of the three BioScene scenarios. Through the reconciliation of potentially conflicting objectives, such as conservation, economic development and human livelihoods, and with a strong participatory planning approach, the MCB scenario could represent an alternative approach to BaU for sustainable rural development in Europe's mountains. BioScene confirms the necessity for natural and social scientists to work together to seek solutions to environmental problems. Interdisciplinary research can assist with the definition of integrated strategies with the potential to reconcile the ecological, social and economic parameters that determine a sustainable future for European mountain areas.
出处 《Journal of Mountain Science》 SCIE CSCD 2006年第4期276-286,共11页 山地科学学报(英文)
关键词 AGRICULTURE interdisciplinary research scenarios stakeholder participation sustainability assessment 欧洲 山区 农业 生物多样性保护 可持续性 跨学科研究 人类生活
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1[1]Audsley E.,Pearn K.R.,Simota C.,Cojacaru G.,Kousidou E.,Rounsevell M.D.A.,Trnka M.and Alexandrov V.2006.What can scenario modelling tell us about future European scale land use,and what not? Environmental Science and Policy 9:148-162.
  • 2[2]Baldock D.,Dwyer J.and Lowe P.2001.The Nature of Rural Development:Towards a Sustainable Integrated Rural Policy for Europe.London:Institute for European Environmental Policy.
  • 3[3]Baldock D.,Beaufoy G.,Brouwer F.and Godeschalk F.(eds.)1997.Farming at the Margins:Abandonment or Redeployment of Agricultural Land in Europe.The Hague:IEEP London/Agricultural Economics Research Institute.
  • 4[4]Beaufoy G.2005.The LFA scheme:how important is it for the future of High Nature Value farming and how should it be reformed? La Canada 19:12-14.
  • 5[5]Breitenmoser U.1998.Large predators in the Alps:the fall and rise of man's competitors.Biological Conservation 83:279-289.
  • 6[6]Bryden J.M.,Bell C.,Gilliat J.,Hawkins E.and MacKinnon N.1994.Farm Household Adjustment in Western Europe,1987-91.Brussels:European Commission.
  • 7[7]Caraveli H.20o0.A comparative analysis on intensification and extensification in Mediterranean agriculture:dilemmas for LFAs policy.Journal of Rural Studies 16:231-242.
  • 8[8]De'ath G.and Fabricious K.E.2000.Classification and regression trees:a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis.Ecology 81:3178-3192.
  • 9[9]Daily G.C.and Ehrlich P.R.1999.Managing Earth's ecosystems:an interdisciplinary challenge.Ecosystems 2:277-280.Available from http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/pdf/2001/acto162en02/3.pdf
  • 10[10]DLG 2005.Land Abandonment,Biodiversity and the CAP.Outcome of an International Seminar in Sigulda,Latvia,7-8October,2004.DLG,Government Service for Land and Water Management,Utrecht,The Netherlands.

同被引文献12

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部