期刊文献+

G-CSF与GM-CSF联合用药治疗化疗后骨髓抑制的比较 被引量:5

Comparison between Combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF in Patients With Arrest of Bone Marrow Caused by Chemotherapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解联合应用G-CSF和GM-CSF治疗Ⅱ度及以上化疗后骨髓抑制的可行性和安全性以及不良反应。方法84例确诊的恶性肿瘤化疗后出现Ⅱ度及以上骨髓抑制的患者,随机单盲分为G-CSF组(G组:n=28,G-CSF150μg/d皮下注射),GM-CSF组(GM组:n=28,GM-CSF150μg/d皮下注射),联合用药组(G/GM组:n=28,G-CSF75μg/d和GM-CSF75μg/d皮下注射)。观察:(1)用CSF后WBC恢复正常所需天数;(2)停用CSF48h后WBC计数;(3)停用CSF48h后PLT计数;(4)不良反应发生率。结果三组患者用药后均能有效提升白细胞。在WBC恢复正常天数上GM组明显长于G组和G/GM组(P<0.05);停药48h后WBC计数GM组和G/GM组明显高于G组(P<0.05);停用CSF48h后PLT计数GM组和G/GM组明显高于G组(P<0.05)。三组不良反应发生率接近,组间比较无显著性差异。结论G-CSF和GM-CSF联合用药能安全、有效地治疗化疗后骨髓抑制,可避免单独用药的弊端,是化疗后骨髓抑制的有效治疗方法。 Objective To investigate the safety, feasibility and adverse reaction of combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF in patients with Ⅱ degree and above arrest of bone marrow caused by chemotherapy. Methotis 84 patients with definite malignant tumor and Ⅱ degree and above arrest of bone marrow caused by chemotherapy were enrolled into a single-blinded and random study: G-CSF group (G group, n = 28, G- CSF 150 μg/d subcutaneous injection), GM-CSF: group(GM group., n = 28, GM-CSF 150 μg/d subcutaneous injection),combination drugs group(G/GM group,n = 28,G-CSF 75 μg/d and GM-CSF 75 μg/d subcutaneous injection). Observation items: (1)the days of WBC normalization after CSF application; (2)WBC count after 48 hours withdrawal of CSF; (3) PLT count after 48 hours withdrawal of CSF; (4) incidence rate of adverse reaction. Results Leukcocyte count in three groups increased. The days of WBC normalization inGM group were longer than that in G group and G/GM group (P〈0. 05). WBC count after 48 hours withdrawal of CSF in GM group and G/GM group was obviously more than that in G group (P〈0. 05). Incidence rate of adverse reaction in three groups was approximate and there was no significant difference between groups. Conclusion Combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF was an effective and safe treatment to be applied in patients with arrest of bone marrow caused by chemotherapy, and it could reduce the defect of single application.
出处 《肿瘤防治研究》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第2期146-148,共3页 Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment
关键词 集落刺激因子 化疗 联合治疗 骨髓抑制 Colony stimulating factor(CSF) Chemotherapy, Combined treatment Arrest of bone marrow
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Robinson BE,Quesenberry PJ.Hematopoietic growth factor:Overview and clinical applications[J].Part Ⅲ Am J Med Sci,1990,300(5):311-321.
  • 2Gottieb RA,Giesing HA,Zhu Jy,et al.Cell acidification in apoptosis:GM-CSF delays programmed cell death in neutrophils by up-regrading the vacuolar H+-AT Pase[J].Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1995,92(13):5965-5968.
  • 3冯威健,刘义冰,刘巍,史健,翟宝娥,杨瑞合.G-CSF/GM-CSF序贯给药与G-CSF单药防治化疗后骨髓抑制的对比研究[J].中国肿瘤临床,2001,28(12):917-920. 被引量:6
  • 4Bregni M,Siena S,Nicola MD,et al.Comparative effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after high-dose cyclophosphamid cancer therapy[J].J Clin Oncol,1996,14(1):628-635.
  • 5张惠民,邓前红.G-CSF、GM-CSF或两者结合治疗化疗后骨髓抑制的疗效比较[J].数理医药学杂志,2000,13(4):311-312. 被引量:4

二级参考文献3

共引文献7

同被引文献65

引证文献5

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部