期刊文献+

单双极电极系统宫腔镜手术对患者电解质影响的比较 被引量:14

Different Effect on Blood Electrolyte between Monopolar and Bipolar Electrode System during Operative Hysteroscopies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】探讨宫腔镜手术中,因电极系统的不同,对患者电解质影响的差别。【方法】选择宫腔镜电切术患者104例,按照手术中应用电极系统的不同将其分为两组:单极电切组50例,双极电切组54例。于术前、术后即刻测定血钠、氯、钾、糖及血浆渗透压等指标,并记录手术时间、膨宫液吸收量。【结果】在单极与双极电切组中,手术时间、膨宫液吸收量和血糖、血钠、血氯变化值分别是:(16±7)min与(14±4)min,495.0mL与300.0mL,(6±9)mmol/L与(1.5±1.0)mmol/L,(-3±5)mmol/L与(-1.5±1.5)mmol/L,(-1±3)mmol/L与(0.5±1.6)mmol/L。与单极电切术比较,双极电切术手术时间短,膨宫液吸收量少,对患者生化的影响更小。【结论】双极电极系统在维持电解质平衡方面更具优越性。 [Objective] To inquire the differences in variations of blood electrolyte in operative hystemscopies with different kinds of electrode system. [ Method] A total of 104 patients were enrolled, including 50 cases of monopolar resectoseopic surgery and 54 cases of bipolar resectoseopic surgery, which was divided according to the difference of electrode system. Serum sodium, chlorine, potassium, glucose and plasm osmolality were measured before and after operation. The operation time and deficit of uterine distention media were recorded. [ Result] In the monopolar and bipolar group, the operation time, absorption volume, and variations of serum glucose, sodium, chlorine were (16±7) min vs. (14±4) min, 495.0 mL vs. 300.0 mL, (6±9) mmol/L vs. (1.5±1.0) retool/L, (-3±5) mmol/L vs. (-1.5±1.5) mmol/L, (-1±3) mmol/L vs. (0.5±1.6) mmol/L, respectively. Compared with the monopolar electrode system, bipolar electrode system was associated with a reduction in operation time and absorption volume of uterine distention medium and makes less influence on blood biochemistry. [Conclusion] Bipoiar electrode system is superior to keep the balance of blood electrolyte.
出处 《中山大学学报(医学科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第2期214-217,共4页 Journal of Sun Yat-Sen University:Medical Sciences
关键词 官腔镜手术 双极电极系统 单极电极系统 血电解质 operative hysteroscopy bipolar electrode system monopolar electrode system blood electrolyte
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1PUCHALSKI A,BRODOWSKA A,BIELEWICZ W.Bipolar hysteroscopic electrosurgery done with Versapoint system:comparison to operations done with monopolar electrodes,own experience[J].Ginekol Pol,2000,71(9):1212-1216.
  • 2MARWAH V,BHANDARI SK.Diagnostic and interventional microhysteroscopy with use of the coaxial bipolar electrode system[J].Fertil Steril,2003,79(2):413-417.
  • 3OLSSON J,BERGLUND L,HAHN RG.Irrigating fluid absorption from the intact uterus[J].Br J Obstet Gynaecol,1996,103(6):558-561.
  • 4JANSEN F W,VREDEVOOGD C B,VAN ULZEN K,et al.Complications of hysteroscopy:a prospective,multicenter study[J].Obstet Gynecol,2000,96 (2):266-270.
  • 5陈潜.前列腺汽化电切术并发症相关因素分析[J].中国内镜杂志,2004,10(2):84-85. 被引量:14
  • 6HAHN R G.Fluid absorption in endoscopic surgery[J].Br J Anaesth,2006,96(1):8-20.
  • 7VILOS G A,ABU-RAFEA B.New developments in ambulatory hysteroscopic surgery[J].Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol,2005,19(5):727-742.
  • 8叶其伟,尹朝晖.经尿道等离子体双极电切治疗前列腺增生75例报告[J].医学理论与实践,2006,19(8):938-939. 被引量:2
  • 9姚泰.生理学[M].6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:234-237.
  • 10GROVE J J,SHINANAMAN R C,DROVER D R.Noncardiogenic pulmonary edema and venous air embolus as complications of operative hysteroscopy[J].J Clin Anesthesia,2004,16(1):48-50.

二级参考文献6

共引文献29

同被引文献129

引证文献14

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部