期刊文献+

下颌骨双侧升支矢状劈开双皮质螺钉内固定的生物力学分析 被引量:1

Biomechanical analysis of mandibular bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with bicortical screws internal fixation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对下颌骨升支矢状劈开不同方式双皮质固位螺钉内固定进行三维有限元分析,为临床提供理论指导。方法:建立下颌骨升支矢状劈开6种双皮质螺钉固定方式的三维有限元模型;计算不同固定方法在3种咬合情况下颌骨的应力、内固定系统的应力以及骨劈开处的位移,对比这些固定方式的固定效果以及不同咬合情况对固定稳定性的影响。结果:在相同咬合情况下,颌骨的应力、内固定系统的应力以及劈开处的位移的大小情况如下:单纯上缘固定大于倒"L"型固定;直径2.0mm大于直径2.7mm螺钉固定;倒"L"型60°大于倒"L"型90°和120°固定;间距2.0cm大于间距3.0cm固定。相同固定方式情况下,颌骨的应力、内固定系统的应力以及劈开处的位移从大到小排列顺序为:前牙咬合、前磨牙咬合、磨牙咬合。结论:双皮质固位螺钉内固定的排列方式,如:间距、角度、位置和内固定系统的规格均对固定稳定性有不同程度的影响;前牙咬合对固定的不良影响最大,应尽量避免。 Objective: To study the mandibular bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) with bicortical screws rigid internal fixation(RIF) with the three-dimensional finite element method, and supply directions for clinic practice. Methods: CT scanned technology and the finite element software (Ansys) were used to establish the three-dimensional finite element model of BSSRO with bicortical screws RIF. The stress distribution of the mandible and the RIF and the displacement of split mandible were calculated under three kind of occlusion situation. Results: Under the same kind of occlusion situation, the stress and displacement of the split mandible with single upper screws fixation was higher than that with the reverse "L" screws fixation, the stress and displacement of the split mandible with 2.0 mm diameter screws fixation was higher than that with 2.7 mm diameter screws fixation. With the same kind of fixation method, the stress and the displacemen of the mandible under the incisor occlusion was the highest. Conclusion:The fixation distance, position, distribution angle of the bicortical screws all have effects on the fixation stability. The patient should avoid the incisor occlusion after the surgery.
出处 《实用口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第6期762-766,共5页 Journal of Practical Stomatology
基金 天津市卫生局课题资助项目(编号:03KZ23)
关键词 双侧升支矢状劈开术 有限元 双皮质螺钉 坚强内固定 Bilateral-sagittal-split-ramus-osteotomy ( BSSRO ) Finite-element Bicortical-screw Rigid -internal-fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1张益 孙勇刚.颌骨坚强内固定[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2003.217-219.
  • 2Chuong C J, Borotikar B, Schwartz-Dabney C, et al. Mechanical characteristics of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: Comparing 2 different fixation techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2005,63 ( 1 ) : 68
  • 3Batenberg RH, Raghoebar GM. Madibular overdentures supported by two or four endosteal implant. A prospective, comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1998,27 (6) :435
  • 4Osborn JW, Baragar FA. Predicted pattern of human muscle activity during clenching derived from a computer assisted model: Symmetric bite force. J Biomechanics, 1985,18 (8) : 599
  • 5刘路平,由敬舜,徐剑青,向喜林,邱森县,丁成辉.五种咬合情况下颞下颌关节负荷的三维有限元分析[J].中华口腔医学杂志,1994,29(6):368-371. 被引量:34
  • 6Champy M, Wilk A, Schnebelen JM. Treatment of mandibular fractures by means of osteosynthesis without intermaxillary immobilization according to F. X. Michelet 's technic. Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl, 1975,63 (4) :339
  • 7Ozden B, Alkan A, Arici S, et al. In vitro comparison of biomechanical characteristics of sagittal split osteotomy fixation techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2006,35 (9) : 837
  • 8Maurer P, Knoll WD, Schubert J. Comparative evaluation of two osteosynthesis methods on stability following sagittal spilt ramus osteomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg,2003,31 (5) :284
  • 9Erkmen E, Simsek B, Yucel E, et al. Comparison different fixation methods following sagittal spilt ramus osteomies using three-dimensional finite elements analysis, Part 1 : Advancement surgery-posterior loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2005,34( 5 ) :551

二级参考文献2

  • 1沈金根,解剖学报,1987年,18卷,1页
  • 2徐永忠,口腔医学纵横,1991年,7卷,100页

共引文献36

同被引文献20

  • 1Trauner R, Obwegeser H. The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. I. Surgical procedures to correct mandibular prognathism and reshaping of the chin [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1957, 10 (7) :677- 689.
  • 2Erkmen E, Simsek B, Yucel E, et al. Three-dimensional finite ele- ment analysis used to compare methods of fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: setback surgery-posterior loading [J]. British Jour- nal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2005,43 (2) : 97-104.
  • 3Maurer P, Knoll W D, Schubert J. Comparative evaluation of two os- teosynthesis methods on stability following sagittal split ramus os- teotomy[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2003, 31 (5) : 284-289.
  • 4Sohmura T, Hojo H, Nakajima M, et al. Prototype of simulation of or- thognathie surgery using a virtual reality haptic device [J]. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2004, 33 (8) : 740-750.
  • 5Eggensperger N, Smolka W, Rahal A, et al. Skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement and setback in single-jaw surgery [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2004,62 (12) : 1486-1496.
  • 6Nooh N. Stability of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split os- teotomy Comparison between positioning screws and plate [J]. The Saudi Dental Journal, 2009,21 (3) : 123-126.
  • 7Chung I H,Yoo C K, Lee E K, et al. Postoperative stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomies for a mandibular setback with mono- cortical plate fixation or bicortical screw fixation [J] . J Oral Maxillo- fac Surg, 2008,66 (3) :446-452.
  • 8Panula K, Finne K, Oikarinen K. Incidence of complications and problems related to orthognathic surgery: a review of 655 patients [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2001,59 (10) : 1128-1136.
  • 9Erkmen E,Simsek B,Yucel E,et al. Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split rarnus osteotomies using three- dimensional finite elements analysis. Part l:advancement surgery- posterior loading [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2005,34 (5) : 551 - 558.
  • 10Ribeiro-Junior P D, Magm-Filho O,Shastri K A,et al. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010, 68 (4) : 724-730.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部