期刊文献+

Mountain Commons: Changing Space and Status at Community Levels in the Himalayas

Mountain Commons: Changing Space and Status at Community Levels in the Himalayas
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This paper deals with the imperatives of nature-society interaction in the Himalayas as seen through CPR (Common Property Resources). It specifically looks at the process and factors that characterize the dynamics of the above interactions, with particular reference to the changing status and governance of CPRs at community levels. The paper puts together the synthesis of observations and inferences of different studies by ICIMOD and others in mountain regions, particularly in different parts of Nepal, India, Bhutan, Bangladesh, China and Pakistan. Rural CPRs (providing sustenance supplies and services) as an important component of a community’s natural resource base, manifest the institutional arrangements evolved by the communities to facilitate their adaptations to nature. The above process can be more clearly illustrated with reference to specific characteristics of mountain areas, called mountain specificities. However, over time, the situation of CPRs in terms of their extent and status, governance and management as well as contributions to community sustenance, has changed. The paper attempts toindicate potential lead lines for searching options for rehabilitation of CPRs, based on a closer under- standing of the factors contributing to their decline.
出处 《Journal of Mountain Science》 SCIE CSCD 2007年第2期124-135,共12页 山地科学学报(英文)
关键词 Nature-society interaction common property resources mountain regions HIMALAYAS 自然-社会关系 普通自然资源 山脉 喜马拉雅山
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1[1]Agarwal,A.and S.Narain.1990.Strategies for the Involvement of Landless and Women in Afforestation:Five Case Studies from India.Geneva:International Labour Office.
  • 2[2]Baral,J.C.2002.Who Should Control Forests of Nepal:Reminiscence of the Past Endeavour and Some Thoughts for the Future Action.E-mail Contribution Mountain Forum-Asia Discussion in Connection with Bishkek Global Mountain Summit,October 2002.(Available from jbaral@wlink.com.np)
  • 3[3]Banskota,M.,T.S.Papola and J.Richter (eds).2000.Growth,Poverty Allevation and Sustainable Resource Management in Mountain Areas of South Asia.Kathmandu:ICIMOD and DSE-ZEL (Feldafing).
  • 4[4]Berkes,F.(eds.).1989.Common Property Resources:Ecology and Community-Based Sustainable Development.London:Belhaven Press.
  • 5[5]Bijonness,I.M.1983.External Economic Dependency and Human Adjustment to Marginal Environments in High Himalaya,Nepal.Mountain Research and Development 3(3):263-72.
  • 6[6]Blaikie and S.Z.Sadeque.2000.Policy in High Places:Environment and Development in the Himalayan Region.Kathmandu:ICIMOD.
  • 7[7]Bromley,D.W.and D.P.Chapagain.1984.The Village Against the Centre:Resource Depletion in South Asia.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 6(5):869-873.
  • 8[8]Dasgupta,J.and H.J.Symlieh.2006.Trends in Tenurial Arrangements of Forests and its Implications for Sustainable Management:A Case Study from Meghalaya,India.(Paper for the 11th Biennial Conference of IASCP,June,Bali)
  • 9[9]Dove,M.R.and C.Carpenter (eds.).1992.Sociology of Natural Resources in Pakistan and Adjoining Countries.Lahore:Vanguard Books Pvt.Ltd.
  • 10[10]EERN.2000.Joint F(o)rest Management and Community Forestry in India:Summary Findings of EERN.Bangalore:Ecological and Economics Research Network.
;
使用帮助 返回顶部