期刊文献+

管理学术与实践隔阂:和谐管理的桥梁作用 被引量:16

Relevance gap between academic and practice of management:Bridging by HeXie management
下载PDF
导出
摘要 管理学术与实践各自自我循环的运作模式,使得二者之间存在较大的隔阂。从管理知识的形成与使用视角来看,原因包括两个方面:首先是管理知识的类型,目前学者们认为面向实际问题解决产生的模式2知识比传统学术研究产生的模式1知识更具实践价值,但分析发现模式1与模式2因其优劣互补而分别适应于不同的管理问题;其次是目前实践者对管理知识的消费偏好,据此给出了缩减管理学术与实践隔阂的整体思路及措施.和谐管理理论揭示了如何定位组织中核心问题以及解决问题的双规则机制,将其应用于上述措施,有助于促进管理学术与实践的有效对话。 The relevance gap between academic and practice of management is produced by their separately cycling operational modes. From the viewpoint of the producing and using of management knowledge, there are two reasons. One reason relates to management knowledge type. Although scholars considered mode 2 knowledge generated by problem solving has more practical value than those by traditional academic research( mode 1 ) , we found that mode 1 knowledge has opposed advantages and weakness to the mode 2 knowledge. They match different management problems in fact. The other reason relates to practitioner' s behavioral preference for management knowledge. Thus, ways to reduce the gap are given. The HeXie management theory discloses universal law of how to locate organizational core issues and solve it with "Dual-principle" Mechanism, so that the theory can fit with practitioners' working customs. The application of HeXie management Theory will pro- mote the communication between academic and practice of management more effectively.
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期1-11,共11页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金优秀创新研究群体基金资助项目(70121001) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70572042)
关键词 管理研究 管理学科属性 知识生产模式 和谐管理 management research property of management discipline knowledge production model HeXie management
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Samuelson R J. The death of management[J]. Newsweek, 1993, 10(5) : 55.
  • 2Mitroff I. Smart Thinking for Crazy Times: The Art of Solving the Right Problems [ M ]. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., 1998.
  • 3Tranfield D, Starkey K. The nature, social organisation and promotion of management research: Towards policy [J]. British Journal of Management, 1998, 9(4) : 341--353.
  • 4Starkey K, Madan P. Bridging the relevance gap: Aligning stakeholders in the future of management research [ J ]. British Journal of Management, 2001, 12( Special Issue) : S3-S26.
  • 5MacLean D, Macintosh R, Grant S. Mode 2 management research [ J ]. British Journal of Management, 2002, 13 (4), 189--207.
  • 6Hambrick D C. What if the academy actually mattered? [J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1994, 19 (1):11--16.
  • 7Van de Ven A H. Professional Science for a Professional School: Action Science and Normal Science [ A ]. In: Beer M & Nohria N (Eds.), Breaking the Code of Change[ M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2000. 393-413.
  • 8Huff A S. Changes in organisational knowledge production: 1999 presidential address [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25 (2) : 288--293.
  • 9Huff A S, Huff J O. Re-focusing the business school agenda[J]. British Journal of Management, 2001,12(Special Issue) : S49-S54.
  • 10Weiick K E. Gapping the relevance bridge: Fashions meet fundamentals in management research [ J ]. British Journal of Management, 2001,12( Special Issue) : S71--S75.

二级参考文献42

共引文献325

同被引文献306

引证文献16

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部