期刊文献+

Evaluation and classification of residential greenbelt quality based on factor analysis & clustering analysis:An example of Xinxiang City,China 被引量:1

基于因子分析和聚类分析的居住区绿地质量评价及分类——以中国新乡市为例(英文)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Five factors expressing greenbelt quality and one factor expressing quantity were adopted for evaluation of the residential greenbelt, and the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method was used to determine the value of factors. Thirty residential areas were selected as the samples. Two principal components were extracted and their expression was constructed by method of factor anlysis, therefore, quality evaluation of residential greenbelt was obtained. The accuracy of the function and implement quality classification toward the residential greenbelts in Xinxiang City were validated by clustering analysis method. The results showed that the greenbelt quality of fourteen residential areas was higher than the average level, of which eleven were newly-built residential areas. The 30 residential areas were classified into three types according to their greenbelt features and their formation by clustering analysis method. Finally rational proposal basing on aforesaid evaluating results was proposed for construction and renewal of residential greenbelt, upon which directive basis was provided for construction and renewal of residential greenbelt. 选取5个反映居住区绿地质量的因子和1个反映量的因子,应用AHP法确定因子的取值。选取30个居住区为样本,应用因子分析法提取主成分,构建主成分的表达式,进而求得居住区绿地质量评价函数。用聚类分析方法对函数的准确性进行验证,并对新乡市居住区的绿地质量进行了分类。绿地质量高于平均水平的居住区有14个,其中11个是新建的住区。用聚类分析将30个居住区分为3类,给出各类居住区绿地的特征并分析了产生的原因。提供一种居住区绿地质量定量评价与分类的方法,根据评价结果为指导居住区绿地建设与更新提供依据。表6参10。
出处 《Journal of Forestry Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2008年第4期311-314,共4页 林业研究(英文版)
基金 supported by the Science and Technology Project of Henan Provincial Science and Technology Department (No.0424490012 ) Major Program of Henan Institute of Science and Technology (No.040132)
关键词 residential area greenbelt quality EVALUATION factor analysis clustering analysis 居民区 绿化带 因子分析 聚类分析 中国 新疆
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献11

  • 1克莱尔.库珀.马库斯(美),卡罗林.弗朗西斯.人性的场所(第二版)[M].俞孔坚译.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001.
  • 2扬.盖尔(丹麦).交往与空间(第四版)[M].何人可译.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002.
  • 3欧圣荣 翁玉慧 傅克昌.景观美质评估法与比较判断法之比较研究.中国园艺,1992,38(1):37-45.
  • 4郑华.北京市绿色嗅觉环境质量评价研究[D].北京林业大学博士论文,2001.
  • 5Zube,E.H.,J.L.Sell,and J.G.Taylor.Landscape Perception:Research,Application[J].Landscape Planning,1982(9):1-33.
  • 6Daniel T.C.,Vining J.Metehdological.Issues in the Assessment of Landscape Quality[A].Altman I.,Wohlwill J.F.Behavior and the Natural Environment[C].New York:Plenum Press,1983.
  • 7Daniel,T.C.and Boster,R.S..Measuring landscape esthetics:the scenic beauty estimation method[A].Range Experiment Station.USDA Forest Service Research[C].1976.
  • 8Tips W.E.J.,Savasalisara T.Landscape Preference Evaluation and Social Cultural Background:a Comparison among Asian Countries[J].Environmental Management,1986(22):113-124.
  • 9Morgan R.Some Factors Affecting Coastal Landscape Aesthetic Quality Assessment[J].Landscape Research,1999(2):167-185.
  • 10Gregory,K.H.and R.J.Davis.The Perception of Riverscape Aesthetics:An Example From Two Hampshire Rivers[J].Environmental Management,1993(39):71-85.

共引文献145

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部