期刊文献+

时间压力、个人相关性对不同类型框架下决策的影响 被引量:10

Effects of Time Pressure and Self-relevance On Decision in Different Type of Frame
下载PDF
导出
摘要 该文以178名大学生为被试,考察三种框架下,时间压力、个人相关性对决策及框架效应的影响。结果表明,风险选择框架中,时间压力大,被试思考点数目少,决策保守;但压力和相关性均没有对框架效应造成影响;判定框架下,相关性越高,思考点数目越多,越不易出现框架效应;决策与思考点数目基本保持一致。 The present research explored the effects of the time pressure and self- relevance on decision in different type of frame with the 178 students. The results presented that in risky - choice framing, in time pressure, subjects showed fewer thought points and made more no - risky choices, meanwhile, there is no effects of time pressure and self - relevance on framing effect. In attribution framing, with high self-relevance, subjects demonstrated more thought points and were less affected by the frame. Moreover, the decision is consistent with the number of thought points.
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第4期27-30,共4页 Psychological Exploration
关键词 框架效应 归因框架 目标框架 风险选择框架 时间压力 framing effects attribution framing goal framing risky - choice framing time pressure
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the rationality of choice. Science, 1981,221:453 -458.
  • 2Levin I P, Schneider S L, Gaeth G J. All frames are not created equal: typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998,76(2) : 149 - 188.
  • 3Smith S M, Levin I P. Need for cognition and choice framing effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1996,9:283 - 293.
  • 4Venkatraman S, Aloysius J A, Davis F D. Multiple prospect framing and decision behavior: The mediational roles of perceived riskiness and perceived ambiguity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2006,101:59 - 73.
  • 5Maule J,Joubert G V. What lies beneath: Reframing framing effects. Thinking & Reasoning, 2007,13 ( 1 ) :25 - 44.
  • 6Ben - Zur H, Bresnitz S J. The effects of time pressure on risky choice behaviour. Acta Psychologica, 1981,47 : 89 - 104.
  • 7Takemura K. Influence of elaboration on the framing of decision. The Journal of Psychology, 1994,128:33 - 39.
  • 8Roszkowski M J, Snelbecker G E. Effects of "framing" on measures of risk: Financial planners are not immune. The Journal of Behavioral Economics, 1990,19:237 - 246.
  • 9Marteau T M. Framing of information: Its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1989,28:89 - 94.
  • 10Leippe M R,Eisenstadt D, Dauch S M, et al.. Timing of eye witness expert testimony, jurors need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trail verdicts. Journal of Applied Psychology ,2004,89 : 524 - 541.

同被引文献201

引证文献10

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部