期刊文献+

Comparison of bolus remifentanil versus bolus fentanyl for blunting cardiovascular intubation responses in children: a randomized, double-blind study 被引量:8

Comparison of bolus remifentanil versus bolus fentanyl for blunting cardiovascular intubation responses in children: a randomized, double-blind study
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background The authors found no study to compare the efficacy of bolus dose fentanyl and remifentanil blunting the cardiovascular intubation response in children, so they designed this randomized, double-blind clinical study to assess the effects of remifentanil 2 μg/kg and fentanyl 2 μg/kg by bolus injection on the cardiovascular intubation response in healthy children.Methods One hundred and two children, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1-2 and scheduled for elective plastic surgery under general anesthesia, were randomly divided into one of two groups to receive the following treatments in a double blind manner: remifentanil 2μg/kg (Group R) and fentanyl 2 μg/kg (Group F) when anesthesia was induced with propofol and vecuronium. The orotracheal intubation was performed using a direct laryngoscope. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded before anesthesia induction (baseline values), immediately before intubation, at intubation and every minute for 5 minutes after intubation. The percent changes of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and HR relative to baseline values and the rate pressure product (RPP) at every observing point were calculated. The incidences of SBP and HR percent changes 〉30% of baseline values and RPP 〉22 000 during the observation were recorded.Results There were no significant differences between groups in the demographic data, baseline values of BP and HR and the intubation time. As compared to baseline values, BP, HR and RPP at intubation and their maximum values during observation increased significantly in Group F, but they all decreased significantly in Group R. BP, HR and RPP at all observed points, and their maximum values during the observation, were significantly different between groups. There were also significant differences between groups in the percent change of SBP and HR relative to baseline values at all observed points and their maximum percent changes during the observation. The incidences of SBP and HR percent increased 〉30% of the baseline values and RPP 〉22 000 during the observation, were significantly higher in Group F than in Group R, but the incidences of SBP and HR percent decreased 〉30% of baseline values were significantly lower in Group F compared with Group R.Conclusions When used as part of routine anesthesia induction with propofol and vecuronium in children, fentanyl 2 μg/kg by bolus injection fails to effectively depress the cardiovascular intubation response. Remifentanil 2 μg/kg by bolus injection can completely abolish the cardiovascular intubation response, but also cause more adverse complications of temporary siclnificant cardiovascular depression. Background The authors found no study to compare the efficacy of bolus dose fentanyl and remifentanil blunting the cardiovascular intubation response in children, so they designed this randomized, double-blind clinical study to assess the effects of remifentanil 2 μg/kg and fentanyl 2 μg/kg by bolus injection on the cardiovascular intubation response in healthy children.Methods One hundred and two children, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1-2 and scheduled for elective plastic surgery under general anesthesia, were randomly divided into one of two groups to receive the following treatments in a double blind manner: remifentanil 2μg/kg (Group R) and fentanyl 2 μg/kg (Group F) when anesthesia was induced with propofol and vecuronium. The orotracheal intubation was performed using a direct laryngoscope. Blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded before anesthesia induction (baseline values), immediately before intubation, at intubation and every minute for 5 minutes after intubation. The percent changes of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and HR relative to baseline values and the rate pressure product (RPP) at every observing point were calculated. The incidences of SBP and HR percent changes 〉30% of baseline values and RPP 〉22 000 during the observation were recorded.Results There were no significant differences between groups in the demographic data, baseline values of BP and HR and the intubation time. As compared to baseline values, BP, HR and RPP at intubation and their maximum values during observation increased significantly in Group F, but they all decreased significantly in Group R. BP, HR and RPP at all observed points, and their maximum values during the observation, were significantly different between groups. There were also significant differences between groups in the percent change of SBP and HR relative to baseline values at all observed points and their maximum percent changes during the observation. The incidences of SBP and HR percent increased 〉30% of the baseline values and RPP 〉22 000 during the observation, were significantly higher in Group F than in Group R, but the incidences of SBP and HR percent decreased 〉30% of baseline values were significantly lower in Group F compared with Group R.Conclusions When used as part of routine anesthesia induction with propofol and vecuronium in children, fentanyl 2 μg/kg by bolus injection fails to effectively depress the cardiovascular intubation response. Remifentanil 2 μg/kg by bolus injection can completely abolish the cardiovascular intubation response, but also cause more adverse complications of temporary siclnificant cardiovascular depression.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2009年第1期44-50,共7页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 REMIFENTANIL FENTANYL general anesthesia tracheal intubation cardiovascular responses CHILDREN remifentanil fentanyl general anesthesia tracheal intubation cardiovascular responses children
  • 相关文献

同被引文献44

  • 1周发春,徐昉.ICU机械通气病人的丙泊酚镇静治疗[J].重庆医学,2005,34(4):578-579. 被引量:18
  • 2CAI Chun-mei,SUN Bao-chen,LIU Xu-yang,WANG Jin-jin,LI Jun-fa,HAN Song,WANG Ning-li,LU Qing-jun.RNA interference inhibits expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in human retinal pigment epithelial cells[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2005(22):1907-1911. 被引量:2
  • 3TIAN Jing-yan LI Guo GU Yan-yun ZHANG Hong-li ZHOU Wen-zhong WANG Xiao ZHU Hong-da LUO Tian-hong LUO Min.Role and mechanism of rosiglitazone on the impairment of insulin secretion induced by free fatty acids on isolated rat islets[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2006(7):574-580. 被引量:9
  • 4Yamagishi M, Shuntoh K, Matsushita T. Halfturnedtruncal switch op- eration for complete transposition of the great arteries with ventricular septaldefectand pulmonary stenosis [ J ]. J ThoracCardiovascSurg, 2010,12(4) : 966-968.
  • 5Kato T, Koitabashi T, Ouchi T. The utility of bispeetral index monito-ring for sedated patients treated with low-dose remifentanil. [ J ]. Clin Monit Comput,2012,26(2) : 459-463.
  • 6Kress JP, 0 Connor MF, Pohlman AS. Sedation of critically ill pa- tients during mechanical ventilation: a comparison of propofol and midazolam [J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2011,153(3) : 1012- 1018.
  • 7Muellejans B, Matthey T, Seholpp J. Sedation in the intensive care u- nit with remifentanil/porpofol versus midazolam/fentanyl: arandom- ised, open-label pharmaeoe-eonomic trial [ J ]. Crit Care, 2011,10 (3) : 91-93.
  • 8Payen JF, Chanques G, Mantz J. Current practices in sedation and analgesia for mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a pro- spective muhieenter patient-based study [ J ]. Anesthesiology, 2011, 10(6) : 687-695.
  • 9Cavaliere F, Masieri S. Opioids and mechanical ventilation [ J]. Curr Drug Targets,2009,10( 3 ) : 816-825.
  • 10J Wilhelm W, Kreuer S. The place for short-acting opioids: special emphasis on remifentanil[ J]. Crit Care,2012,12(3) : 95-98.

引证文献8

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部