期刊文献+

厚度配比对2种牙科陶瓷疲劳行为的影响研究 被引量:2

The influence of thickness ratios on the fatigue behaviors of two kinds of dental ceramic
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的考察不同厚度配比的Empress Ⅱ热压铸造陶瓷和GI-Ⅱ型氧化铝渗透陶瓷层状复合结构经Hertzian循环疲劳前后强度的变化。方法分别制作不同厚度配比Empress Ⅱ热压铸造陶瓷和GI-Ⅱ型氧化铝渗透陶瓷圆盘状试件,应用Hertzian接触实验方法对这些试件进行循环加载,然后测试105循环加载前后试件的临界载荷。结果Empress Ⅱ热压铸造陶瓷和GI-Ⅱ型氧化铝渗透陶瓷在经Hertzian循环加载后,临界载荷力的平均值比加载前均明显下降(P<0.05),并且载荷力随底层瓷厚度的下降而降低。GI-Ⅱ氧化铝渗透陶瓷在加载前后的临界载荷均明显高于Empress Ⅱ热压铸造陶瓷(P<0.05)。结论循环疲劳能显著降低Empress Ⅱ热压铸造陶瓷和GI-Ⅱ型氧化铝渗透陶瓷材料的强度,后者在抗碎裂能力和耐受疲劳方面均优于前者,底层瓷的强度和厚度是决定这2种材料临界载荷力的大小的主要因素。 Objective To investigate the intensity changes of different thickness ratios of Empress Ⅱ glass ceramic and GI-Ⅱ glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic before and after Hertzian contact cyclic fatigue. Methods Disk-shaped specimens of different thickness ratios of Empress Ⅱ glass ceramic and GI-Ⅱ glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic were respectively fabricated. Hertzian contact technique was imposed on the specimens. Critical loads of the specimens before and after 10^5 cycles loading were recorded. Results The average values of critical loads of all specimens reduced significantly after cycles loading (P〈0.05), and critical loads declined with diminishing thickness of the core ceramic. The critical load of GI-Ⅱglass-infiltrated alumina ceramic was significantly higher than Empress Ⅱ glass ceramic before and after cycle loading (P〈0.05). Conclusion Cycle loading can reduce the strengths of the two kinds of dental ceramic, and the latter is better than the former in the resistance to fracture and cyclic fatigue. Critical loads of the two kinds of dental ceramic are mainly influenced by the core ceramic's strength and thickness.
出处 《华西口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第1期92-95,共4页 West China Journal of Stomatology
基金 上海市科委科技攻关重点资助项目(054119533)
关键词 牙科陶瓷 厚度配比 循环疲劳 临界载荷 dental ceramic thickness ratio cycle fatigue critical load
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1郭玲,朱智敏.牙科陶瓷材料摩擦学研究进展[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2008,35(2):213-215. 被引量:1
  • 2Chai H, Lawn BIL Wutfiphan S. Fracture modes in brittle coatingswith large interlayer modulus mismatch[J]. J Mater Res, 1999, 14 (9) : 3805-3817.
  • 3Fischer-Cripps AC, Lawn BR, Pajares A, et al. Stress analysis of elastic-plastic contact damage in ceramic coating on metal substrates[J]. J Am Ceram Soc, 1996, 79(10):2619-2625.
  • 4Zhao H, Hu XZ, Bush MB, et al. Contact damage in porcelain/ pd-alloy hilayers[J]. J Mater Res, 2000, 15(3):676-682.
  • 5Jung YG, Wuttiphan S, Peterson IM, et al. Damage modes in dental layer structures[J]. J Dent Res, 1999, 78(4):887-897.
  • 6Rhee YW, Kim HW, Deng Y, et al. Contact-induced damage in ceramic coatings on compliant substrates: Fracture mechanics and design[J]. J Am Ceram Soc, 2001, 84(5): 1066-1072.
  • 7Deng Y, Lawn BR, Lloyd IK. Characterization of damage modes in dental ceramic bilayer structures[J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 2002, 63 (2) : 137-145.
  • 8Miranda P, Pajares A, Guiberteau F, et al. Designing damageresistant brittle-coating structures: Ⅰ. Bilayers[J]. Acta Mater, 2003, 51 (203) :4347-4356.
  • 9Lawn BR, Pajares A, Zhang Y, et al. Materials design in the performance of all-ceramic crowns[J]. Biomaterials, 2004, 25 (14): 2885-2892.
  • 10Lee CS, Kim DK. Rate effects in critical loads for radial cracking in ceramic coatings[J]. J Am Ceram Soc, 2002, 85 (8):2019- 2024.

二级参考文献12

  • 1杨旭,郭照中,陈思韩,肖莉,章彦彦.丙烯酸树脂牙与树脂及陶瓷材料相对磨耗的体外研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2006,22(7):427-428. 被引量:1
  • 2[1]Wall JG,Reisbick MH,Johnston WM.Int J Prosthodont,1992,5(5):441-446.
  • 3[2]McLean JW.J Prosthet Dent,2001,85(1):61-66.
  • 4[3]Hu X,Shortall AC,Marquis PM.J Oral Rehabil,2002,29(8):756-764.
  • 5[4]air LH.Stolarski TA,Vowles RW,et al.J Dent,1996,24(1/2):141-148.
  • 6[8]Nagarajan VS.Jahanmir S,Thompson VP.Dent Mater,2004,20(1):63-71.
  • 7[9]Hu X,Shortall AC,Marquis PM.J Oral Behabil,2003,30(7):729-737.
  • 8[10]Hu X,Harrington E,Marquis PM,et al.Biomaterials,1999,20(10):907-912.
  • 9[11]Derand P,Vereby P.J Prosthet Dent,1999,81(4):460-463.
  • 10[12]Schuh C,Kinast EJ,Mezzomo E,et al.J Prosthet Dent,2005,93(3):245-252.

同被引文献14

  • 1刘伟才,黄承敏,巢永烈,万乾炳.牙科陶瓷赫兹接触破坏研究[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2005,6(3):193-195. 被引量:2
  • 2刘伟才,张志升,黄承敏,巢永烈,万乾炳.牙科Vita markⅡ可切削陶瓷赫兹触压循环疲劳研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2006,24(4):306-308. 被引量:4
  • 3Wakabayashi N,Anusavice K J. C rack Initiation Modes in bilayered alumina/porcelain disks as a function of core/veneer thickness ratio and supporting substrate stiffness[J]. J Dent Res,2000,79 (6) : 1 398- 1 404.
  • 4Wagner W C,Chu T M. Biaxial flexural strength and indentation fracture toughness of three new dental core ceramics[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1996,76:140-144.
  • 5Harrington Z A, McDonald, Knowles J. An in vitro study to investi- gate the load at fracture of Procera AllCeram crowns with various thickness of ocelnsal veneer porcelain[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2003,16 ( 1 ) :54-58.
  • 6Sundh A,Sjogren G. A comparison of fracture strength of yttrium- oxide- partially-stabilized zirconia ceramic crowns with varying core thickness, shapes and veneer ceramics [J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2004,31 (7) : 682-685.
  • 7Fleming G J, Dickens M,Thomas L J, et al. The in vitro failure of all- ceramic crowns and the connector area of fixed partial dentures using bilayered ceramic specimens : the influence of core to dentin thick- ness ratio[J]. Dent Mater, 2006,22 (8) : 771-777.
  • 8Fleming G J, Dickens M,Thomas L J,et al. The effect of core : dentin thickness ratio on the bi-axial flexure strength and fracture mode and origin of bilayered dental ceramic composites [J]. Dent Mater, 2005,21(2) : 164-171.
  • 9Neiva G,Yaman P,Dennison J B,et al. Resistance to fracture of three all-ceramic systems[J]. J Esthet Dent, 1998,10(2) :61-66.
  • 10Philp G K, Brukl C E. Compressive strengths of conventional, twin foil, and all-ceramic crowns[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1984,52:215-220.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

;
使用帮助 返回顶部