摘要
Objective To observe the clinical effects of chronic non-bacterial prostatitis treated with warm needling moxibustion. Methods One hundred and twenty-five cases were randomly divided into warm needling moxibustion group （42 cases）, acupuncture group （41 cases） and western medicine group （42 cases）. Of which, in warm needling moxibustion group, acupuncture combined with warming acupuncture were provided①puncture on Shènshū（肾俞 BL 23）, Gānshū （肝俞BL 18） and Zhìbiān （秩边BL 54） without retention of needles,②Guānyuán （关元CV 4）, Zhō ngjí （ 中极CV 3）, Yīnlíngquán （ 阴陵 GB 34） and Sānyīnjiāo （三阴交 SP 6） ,with warming acupuncture, once a day; in acupuncture group, the prescriptions and needling technique were the same as those in warm needling moxibustion group, without moxibustion; in western medicine group, Cernilton was applied twice a day, one pill for each time. After one course treatment, the therapeutic effects and NIH-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index （NIH-CPSI） of 3 groups were compared. Results The total effective rate was 88. 10% in warm needling moxibustion group, 63.41% in acupuncture group, and 66.67% in western medicine group. The clinical effect in warm needling moxibustion group was superior to that in either acupuncture group or western medicine group （both P〈0.05）. The score of NIH-CPSI was 11.92 ±7.11 in warm needling moxibustion group, 16.08±6.83 in acupuncture group, and 15.66±5.88 in western medicine group. The score of each group was obviously reduced （both P〈0.01 ） after treatments, in which, the reduction in warm needling moxibustion group was most obvious （both P〈0.0t）. Conclusion A good therapeutic effect of chronic non-bacterial prostatitis was received by warm needling moxibustion.
目的:观察温针灸治疗慢性非细菌性前列腺炎的临床疗效。方法:将125例患者随机分为温针灸组(42例)、针刺组(41例)、西药组(42例)。温针灸组予针刺配合温针灸治疗,①针刺肾俞、肝俞、秩边,不留针,②关元、中极、阴陵泉、三阴交,行温针灸,每天治疗1次;针刺组取穴、针刺法同温针灸组,只针刺不施灸;西药组口服普适泰片(舍尼通) ,每次1片,每日2次。分别治疗1个疗程后,进行疗效及慢性前列腺炎症状积分(NI H-CPSI)比较。结果:温针灸组总有效率88.10 %,针刺组63.41 %,西药组66.67 %,温针灸组临床疗效优于针刺组和西药组(均P 0.05)。温针灸组治疗后NI H-CPSI积分为11.92±7.11 ,针刺组为16.08±6.83 ,西药组为15.66±5.88 ,各组积分均较治疗前明显降低(均P 0.01) ,且治疗后温针灸组积分较针刺组、西药组下降明显(均P 0.01)。结论:温针灸对慢性非细菌性前列腺炎有良好治疗效果。
