摘要
目的对革兰阴性菌产AmpC酶的检测方法进行评价,并寻找一种适合临床常规应用的AmpC酶检测方法。方法对39株耐头孢西丁的革兰阴性菌同时进行改良Hodge试验、三维试验、氯唑西林(CLO)双纸片协同试验和ampC基因聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测,比较4种方法的结果。结果39株革兰阴性杆菌中,改良Hodge试验、三维试验和CLO双纸片协同试验检出产AmpC酶的阳性率分别为38.5%、43.6%和28.2%,3种方法AmpC酶检出率的差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。与PCR结果比较,改良Hodge试验特异性为87%,敏感性为75%;三维试验的特异性为78%,敏感性为75%;CLO双纸片协同试验特异性为87%,敏感性为50%。PCR显示ampC基因阳性率为41%(16/39),对16株阳性菌进行ampC基因测序,测序结果与基因数据库内相应的ampC核酸序列比对发现,同源性均在98%~100%之间。结论改良Hodge试验可作为一种操作快速、简便的筛选试验检测革兰阴性菌产AmpC酶的情况,而CLO双纸片协同试验可作为一种操作简便的排除产AmpC酶试验应用于实验室,但在准确性上低于改良Hodge试验。
Objective To evaluate methods for detecting AmpC beta-lactamase produced by Gram-negative bacillus and find a convenient and suitable method for clinical laboratories. Methods Modified Hodge test , three-dimensional test, cloxacillin (CLO) double-disk synergy test and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were performed in the 39 cefoxitin-resistant strains of Gram-negative bacillus, and then their results were compared. Results From the 39 strains of Gram-negative bacillus, the AmpC positive rates of modified Hodge test, three-dimensional test and CLO double-disk synergy test were 38.5% , 43.6% and 28.2% , respectively. The percentage of detection of AmpC had no significant difference among three phenotype screening tests (P 〉 0.05 ). In comparison with the results of PCR, the specificity and sensitivity were 87% and 75% for modified Hodge test, 78% and 75% for three-dimensional test, and 87% and 50% for CLO double-disk synergy test. The results of PCR showed that there were 16 positive strains carrying ampC gene and the percentage was 41% (16/39). They were sequenced, and then the ampC gene sequencing results of 16 strains indicated that the homology was from 98% to 100% by comparing with the gene bank. Conclusions Modified Hodge test is a convenient method to detect MnpC enzyme produced by Gram-negative bacillus, and CLO double-disk synergy test is easy to use in clinical laboratories to eliminate a possibility of AmpC beta-lactamases production, but modified Hodge test is better than CLO double-disk synergy test in the accuracy.
出处
《检验医学》
CAS
北大核心
2010年第2期122-125,共4页
Laboratory Medicine