期刊文献+

Can color vision variation explain sex differences in invertebrate foraging by capuchin monkeys? 被引量:1

Can color vision variation explain sex differences in invertebrate foraging by capuchin monkeys?
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Invertebrates are the main source of protein for many small-to-medium sized monkeys. Prey vary in size, mobility, degree of protective coveting, and use of the forest, i.e. canopy height, and whether they are exposed or embed themselves in substrates. Sex-differentiation in foraging patterns is well documented for some monkey species and recent studies find that color vision phenotype can also affect invertebrate foraging. Since vision phenotype is polymorphic and sex-linked in most New World monkeys - males have dichromatic vision and females have either dichromatic or trichromatic vision - this raises the possibility that sex differences are linked to visual ecology. We tested predicted sex differences for invertebrate foraging in white-faced capuchins Cebus capucinus and conducted 12 months of study on four free-ranging groups between January 2007 and September 2008. We found both sex and color vision effects. Sex: Males spent more time foraging for invertebrates on the ground. Females spent more time consuming embedded, colonial invertebrates, ate relatively more "soft" sedentary invertebrates, and devoted more of their activity budget to invertebrate foraging. Color Vision: Dichromatic monkeys had a higher capture efficiency of ex- posed invertebrates and spent less time visually foraging. Trichromats ate relatively more "hard" sedentary invertebrates. We con- elude that some variation in invertebrate foraging reflects differences between the sexes that may be due to disparities in size, strength, reproductive demands or niche preferences. However, other intraspecific variation in invertebrate foraging that might be mistakenly attributed to sex differences actually reflects differences in color vision [Current Zoology 56 (3): 300-312, 2010].
出处 《Current Zoology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第3期300-312,共13页 动物学报(英文版)
基金 supported by grants from The Leakey Foundation the Alberta Ingenuity Fund the Animal Behavior Society the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) NSERC and the Canada Research Chairs Program the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (16405015) (A) (19207018) from JSPS
关键词 Male Foraging Female Foraging CEBUS Dichromacy Trichromaey Invertebrate Foraging 无脊椎动物 性别差异 卷尾猴 觅食 色觉
  • 相关文献

参考文献67

  • 1Ahmann J.1974.Observational study of behaviour Sampling meth ods.Behaviour 49:227-265.
  • 2Beck C,Iverson S,Bowen D,Blanchard W,2007.Sex differences in grey seal diet reflect seasonal variation in foraging behaviour and reproductive expenditure:Evidence from quantitative fatty acid signature analysis.Journal of Animal Ecology 76(3):490-502.
  • 3Boinski S.1989.The positional behavior and substrate use of squirrel monkeys:Ecological implications.Journal of Human Evolution 18:659-677.
  • 4Buchanan-Smith H,Smith AC,Surridge AK,Prescott MJ,Osorio D et al.,2005.The effect of sex and color vision status on prey capture by captive and wild tamarins Saguinus spp.The American Journal of Primatology 66(Supplement 1):49.
  • 5Caine N,Osorio D,Mundy NI,2009.A foraging advantage for di chromatic marmosets Callithrix geoffivyi at low light intensity.Biology Letters Published Online September 9 (doi:10.1098/ rsbl.2009.0591).
  • 6Campos F,Fedigan LM,2009.Behavioral adaptations to heat stress and water scarcity in white-faced capuchins Cebus capucinus in Santa Rosa National Park,Costa Rica.American Journal of Physi cal Anthropology 138:101-111.
  • 7Chapman C,1986.Boa constrictor predation and group response in white-faced capuchin monkeys.Biotropica 18:171-172.
  • 8Chapman C,Fedigan L,1990.Dietary differences between neighbouring Cebus capucinus groups:Local traditions,food availability or responses to food profitability? Folia Primatologica 54:177-186.
  • 9Clark J,Manly B,Kerry K,Gardner H,Franchi E et al.,1998.Sex differences in Adelie penguin foraging strategies.Polar Biology 20(4):248-258.
  • 10Cowlishaw G,Dunbar RIM,2000.Primate Conservation Biology.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部