期刊文献+

人格特征对不同类型框架下决策的影响 被引量:15

Effects of Personality on Decision making in Different Types of Frameing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以159名大学生为被试,考察三种框架下,人格因素对框架效应下决策的影响。结果表明,风险决策框架中,敢为者倾向于选择高风险选项,忧虑者倾向于选择低风险选项;女生更容易出现框架效应。目标框架下,忧虑越高,越易出现框架效应。在归因框架中,支配性越强,越倾向于做"健康"判断;敢为性越强者,越倾向于做出"安全"判断;敏感、忧虑、内向者,倾向于做悲观判断。自律性越高者框架效应越小;男生更容易出现框架效应。 The present research explored the effects of personality traits on decision making in different types of frameing with 159 students as subjects. The results showed that in the risk-choice framing, adventurous judges .always made highly risky choices, but worrying judges preferred choices with lower risks, and females had much more discrepancy than males. Moreover, in the goal framing, anxiety was correlated to decision-making discrepancy. Finally, in the risk-choice framing, the dominating judges were prone to believe others are healthy, while the adventurous judges inclined to presume others are safe, and those who were sensitive, anxious or introversive were prone to be pessimistic. And fewer framing effects could be observed in autonomic students and females.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第4期823-826,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
关键词 框架效应 风险决策框架 目标框架 归因框架 人格特征 framing effects, risky-choice framing, goal framing, attribution framing, personality
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Tversky, A. Kahneman, D. The framing of decisions and the rationality of choice. Science, 1981, 221,453 - 458.
  • 2Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., Gaeth, G. J. All frames are not created equal: typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998, 76(2): 149- 188.
  • 3Krishnamurthy, P., Carter, P., Blair, E. Attribute framing and goal framing effects in health decisions.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2001, 85, 382- 399.
  • 4Maule, J, Joubert, G.V. What lies beneath: Reframing framing effects. Thinking & Reasoning, 2007, 13 ( 1 ) : 25 - 44.
  • 5刘涵慧,周洪雨,车宏生.时间压力、个人相关性对不同类型框架下决策的影响[J].心理学探新,2008,28(4):27-30. 被引量:10
  • 6Raghunathan, R, Pham, M.T. All negative moods are not equal: Motivational influences of anxiety and sadness on decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1999, 79(1): 56- 77.
  • 7Butler, G, Mathews, A . Anticipatory anxiety and risk perception . Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1987, 11: 551 - 565.
  • 8Lemer, J.S. , Keltner, D. Beyond Valence: Toward a Model of Emotion - Specific Influences on Judgement and Choice. Cognition and Emotion, 2000, 14: 473- 494.
  • 9Gambetti, E , Giusberti , F Trait Anger and Anger Expression Style in Children's Risky Decisions. Aggressive behavior, 2009, 35, 14-23.
  • 10Zaleskiewicz, T. Beyond risk seeking and risk aversion: personality and the dual nature of economic risk taking . European Journal of Personality, 2001, 15, 105 - 122.

二级参考文献11

  • 1Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the rationality of choice. Science, 1981,221:453 -458.
  • 2Levin I P, Schneider S L, Gaeth G J. All frames are not created equal: typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998,76(2) : 149 - 188.
  • 3Smith S M, Levin I P. Need for cognition and choice framing effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1996,9:283 - 293.
  • 4Venkatraman S, Aloysius J A, Davis F D. Multiple prospect framing and decision behavior: The mediational roles of perceived riskiness and perceived ambiguity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2006,101:59 - 73.
  • 5Maule J,Joubert G V. What lies beneath: Reframing framing effects. Thinking & Reasoning, 2007,13 ( 1 ) :25 - 44.
  • 6Ben - Zur H, Bresnitz S J. The effects of time pressure on risky choice behaviour. Acta Psychologica, 1981,47 : 89 - 104.
  • 7Takemura K. Influence of elaboration on the framing of decision. The Journal of Psychology, 1994,128:33 - 39.
  • 8Roszkowski M J, Snelbecker G E. Effects of "framing" on measures of risk: Financial planners are not immune. The Journal of Behavioral Economics, 1990,19:237 - 246.
  • 9Marteau T M. Framing of information: Its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1989,28:89 - 94.
  • 10Leippe M R,Eisenstadt D, Dauch S M, et al.. Timing of eye witness expert testimony, jurors need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trail verdicts. Journal of Applied Psychology ,2004,89 : 524 - 541.

共引文献9

同被引文献132

引证文献15

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部