期刊文献+

A Controlled Study on Comparing Differences in CT Perfusion Imaging between Rabbits inoculated with VX2 Lung Tumor and Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung 被引量:3

A Controlled Study on Comparing Differences in CT Perfusion Imaging between Rabbits inoculated with VX2 Lung Tumor and Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung
下载PDF
导出
摘要 OBJECTIVE By analysis and evaluation of the perfusion images and perfusion parameters of the rabbits with VX2 lung tumor, the association between the perfusion parameters and tumor angiogenesis of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung has been studied in order to establish a non-invasive and effective way to detect tumor blood supply, which is be able to exhibit hemodynamic data in tumors during cancer treatments. METHODS Fifteen Netherlands rabbits inoculated with VX2 lung tumor (rabbit group) and 25 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (patient group) received a multi-slice spiral CT perfusion imaging test using the Netherlands PHILIPS Brilliance 16-slice spiral CT and a U.S. MEDRAD binocular highpressure syringe. Image postprocessing was done using the special perfusion software and EBW 4.0 Workstation. Perfusion volume (PV), peak enhanced increment (PEI), transit time peak (TTP), and blood volume (BV) were measured and analyzed. RESULTS In the rabbit group, the values of the PV, PEI, TTP, and BV of the tumor margin were (53.89 ± 13.38) mL/(min.mL), (45.71 ± 15.52) Hu, (39.29 ± 10.10) sec, and (31.45 ± 18.19) mL/100 g, respectively; these values of the tumor center were (36.57 ± 14.17) mL/(min.mL), (28.64 ± 11.74) Hu, (39.00 + 9.78) sec, and (19.76 ± 13.95) mL/100 g, respectively; the values of the muscles were (12.45± 4.38) mL/(min.mL), (10.98 ± 5.03) Hu, (38.86 ± 10.04) sec, and (5.38 ±2.87) mL/100 g, respectively. The values of the relative perfusion volume (RPV), relative peak enhanced increment (RPEI), and relative blood volume (RBV) of the tumor margin were 4.38 ± 1.45, 3.96± 1.45, 9.99 ± 11.7, respectively; these values of the tumor center were 2.14 ± 1.08, 1.83±1.45, 4.17 ±3.39, respectively. The values of the PV, PEL BV of the tumor margin vs. the values of the muscles developed t-values, which were 15.028, 10.79, and 5.88, respectively (P ≤ 0.01), with statistical significance; the values of the PV, PEI, BV of the tumor center vs. the values of the muscles produced t-values, which were 8.67, 7.49, and 4.55, respectively (P 〈 0.01), with statistical significance. The values of the TTP of the tumor margin vs. TTP values of the muscles, and the TTP values of the tumor center vs. TTP values of the muscles developed t-values, which were 1.7 and 0.806, respectively (P ≥ 0.05), without statistical significance. In the patient group, the values of the PV, PE, TTP, and BV of the tumor margin were (88.95 ± 30.89) mL/(min.mL), (61.87 ± 27.31) Hu, (37.72 ± 12.53) sec, and (18.38 ± 7.2) mL/100 g, respectively; these values of the tumor center were (39.77 ± 18.29) mL/(min.mL), (14.57 ± 8.1) Hu, (35.64 ± 12.41) sec, and (11.22 ± 6.02) mL/100 g, respectively; these values of the muscles were (12.45 ± 6.5) mL/(min.mL), (6.14 ± 2.66) Hu, (35.68± 12.35) sec, and (2.23 ± 1.11) mL/100 g, respectively. The values of the RPV, RPEI, and RBV of the tumor margin were 8.05 ± 5.04, 8.87 ± 4.32, and 12.16 ± 8.49, respectively; these values of the tumor center were 2.39 ± 1.68, 2.97 ± 2.1, 3.53 ± 2.82, respectively. The values of the PV, PEI, BV of the tumor margin in the patient group vs. the values of the muscles produced t-values, which were 13.8, 10.85, and 12.22, respectively (P 〈 0.01), with significant differences; these values of the tumor center vs. the values of the muscles developed t-values, which were 9.158, 6.26, 8.654, respectively (P 〈 0.01), with significant differences. The TTP value of the tumor margin vs. that of the muscles produced t-value, which was 0.371, and the TTP value of the tumor center vs. that of the muscles developed t-value, which was 1 (P 〉 0.05), without statistical difference. CONCLUSION CT perfusion imaging technics demonstrates directly dynamic changes of blood flow to tumors, which assists in identifying tumor growth and necrosis, therefore, this research provides an evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of human lung squamous cell carcinoma and has far-reaching clinical significance.
出处 《Clinical oncology and cancer researeh》 CAS CSCD 2010年第6期366-372,共7页
关键词 perfusion imaging lung neoplasms controlled study. 多层螺旋CT 鳞状细胞癌 肿瘤患者 灌注参数 兔子 肺癌 接种 反应堆压力容器
  • 相关文献

同被引文献23

  • 1张景峰,王仁法,吴静,杨岷.兔VX2软组织肿瘤TAE治疗前后MSCT灌注成像研究[J].放射学实践,2005,20(2):110-113. 被引量:8
  • 2周华,张敏鸣,肖圣祥,王丽君,周敏,邹煜.动态增强CT功能成像评价肺癌肿瘤血管生成的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(2):171-175. 被引量:28
  • 3Qiang Zhang Jun Guo Hailong Qian Baoqi Shi Jigang Zhang Chunjing Li Ailing Yang Zhuang Tian Baotou No. 7 Hospital,Department of Radiol-ogy, Baotou Cancer Hospital, Baotou 014030, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China..Studies on Lung Cancer Angiogenesis-Application of Interventional Therapy (A Report of 56 Cases)[J].Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology,2007,4(1):61-64. 被引量:5
  • 4Brian Durkin,Christopher Page,Peter Glass.Pregabalin for the treatment of postsurgical pain[J]. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy . 2010 (16)
  • 5Andrew N. Davies,Andrew Dickman,Colette Reid,Anna-Marie Stevens,Giovambattista Zeppetella.The management of cancer-related breakthrough pain: Recommendations of a task group of the Science Committee of the Association for Palliative Medicine of Great Britain and Ireland[J]. European Journal of Pain . 2008 (4)
  • 6Carl D. Martin,Juan Miguel Jimenez-Andrade,Joseph R. Ghilardi,Patrick W. Mantyh.Organization of a unique net-like meshwork of CGRP+ sensory fibers in the mouse periosteum: Implications for the generation and maintenance of bone fracture pain[J]. Neuroscience Letters . 2007 (3)
  • 7Kristina B. Svendsen,Steen Andersen,Sigurdur Arnason,Staffan Arnér,Harald Breivik,Tarja Heiskanen,Eija Kalso,Ulf E. Kongsgaard,Per Sjogren,Peter Strang,Flemming W. Bach,Troels S. Jensen.Breakthrough pain in malignant and non-malignant diseases: a review of prevalence, characteristics and mechanisms[J]. European Journal of Pain . 2004 (2)
  • 8Klaus Eckhardt,Susanne Ammon,Ute Hofmann,Anja Riebe,Nadja Gugeler,Gerd Mikus.Gabapentin Enhances the Analgesic Effect of Morphine in Healthy Volunteers[J]. Anesthesia & Analgesia . 2000 (1)
  • 9杨军,彭栋梁,张晓黎,李兰芳.舒芬太尼腰硬联合治疗重症癌痛的临床观察[J].四川医学,2008,29(9):1249-1251. 被引量:4
  • 10刘希江,田玉科.骨癌疼痛机制与相关药物治疗研究进展[J].中国癌症杂志,2009,19(2):154-157. 被引量:9

引证文献3

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部