期刊文献+

Responses of Different Physiological Indices for Maize(Zea mays) to Soil Water Availability 被引量:2

Responses of Different Physiological Indices for Maize(Zea mays) to Soil Water Availability
原文传递
导出
摘要 Knowledge of plant responses to soil water availability is essential for the development of effcient irrigation strategies.However,notably different results have been obtained in the past on the responses of various physiological indices for different plants to soil water availability.In this study,the responses of various plant processes to soil water availability were compared with data from pot and field plot experiments conducted on maize(Zea mays L.).Consistent results were obtained between pot and field plot experiments for the responses of various relative plant indices to changes in the fraction of available soil water(FASW).A threshold value,where the relative plant indices began to decrease with soil drying,and a lower water limit,where the decline of relative plant indices changed to a very slow rate,were found.Evaporative demand not only influenced the transpiration rate over a daily scale but also determined the difference in transpirational response to soil water availability among the transient,daily and seasonal time scales.At the seasonal scale,cumulative transpiration decreased linearly with soil drying,but the decrease of transpiration from FASW = 1 in response to water deficits did not affect dry weight until FASW = 0.75.On the other hand,the decrease in dry weight was comparable with plant height and leaf area.Therefore,the plant responses to soil water availability were notably different among various plant indices of maize and were influenced by the weather conditions. Knowledge of plant responses to soil water availability is essential for the development of effcient irrigation strategies.However,notably different results have been obtained in the past on the responses of various physiological indices for different plants to soil water availability.In this study,the responses of various plant processes to soil water availability were compared with data from pot and field plot experiments conducted on maize(Zea mays L.).Consistent results were obtained between pot and field plot experiments for the responses of various relative plant indices to changes in the fraction of available soil water(FASW).A threshold value,where the relative plant indices began to decrease with soil drying,and a lower water limit,where the decline of relative plant indices changed to a very slow rate,were found.Evaporative demand not only influenced the transpiration rate over a daily scale but also determined the difference in transpirational response to soil water availability among the transient,daily and seasonal time scales.At the seasonal scale,cumulative transpiration decreased linearly with soil drying,but the decrease of transpiration from FASW = 1 in response to water deficits did not affect dry weight until FASW = 0.75.On the other hand,the decrease in dry weight was comparable with plant height and leaf area.Therefore,the plant responses to soil water availability were notably different among various plant indices of maize and were influenced by the weather conditions.
出处 《Pedosphere》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2011年第5期639-649,共11页 土壤圈(英文版)
基金 Supported by the CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams the Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No.KSCX1-YW-09-07) the National Natural Science Foundationof China (No.40671083)
关键词 dry weight evaporative demand fraction of available soil water plant growth TRANSPIRATION 土壤水分有效性 玉米 生理指数 田间小区试验 植物反应 蒸腾速率 土壤干燥 可用性
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration Guidelines for Com- puting Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Rome, Italy.
  • 2Bielorai, H. 1973. Prediction of irrigation needs. In Yaron, B., Danfos, E. and Vaadia, Y. (eds.) Arid Zone Irrigation. Springer, Berlin. pp. 359-368.
  • 3Calvino, P. A., Andrade, F. H. and Sadras, V. O. 2003. Maize yield as affected by water availability, soil depth, and crop management. Agron. J. 95:275 281.
  • 4Casadebaig, P., Debaeke, P. and Lecoeur, J. 2008. Thresholds for leaf expansion and transpiration response to soil water deficit in a range of sunflower genotypes.Eur. J. Agron. 28:646 654.
  • 5Denmead, O. T. and Shaw, R. H. 1962. Availability of soil water to plants as affected by soil moisture content and meteorological conditions. Agron. J. 45: 385-390.
  • 6Erickson, P. I., Ketring, D. L. and Stone, J. F. 1991. Response of internal tissue water balance of peanut to soil water. Agron. J. 83: 248-253.
  • 7Hurley, M. B., Rowarth, J M. F. and Rowe, R. N S., Trought, M. C. T., Barnes, 1998. Variations in water availability and temperature in the root environment during root volume restriction studies. New Zeal. J. Crop Hort. 26: 127-134.
  • 8Jones, H. G. 1992. Plants and Microclimate: A Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology. 2nd Edition. Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • 9Kang, S. Z., Gu, G. B., Du, T. S. and Zhang, J. H. 2003. Crop coefficient and ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration of winter wheat and maize in a semi-humid region. Agr. Water Manage. 59: 239-254.
  • 10Keller, A. and Seekler, D. 2004. Limits to Increasing the Productivity of Water in Crop Production. Winrock Water, Arlington.

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部