期刊文献+

多中心临床试验疗效一致性评价方法 被引量:2

Consistency efficacy assessment of multi-regional clinical trials
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着临床试验全球化的增长趋势,多中心临床试验已经受到了广泛的关注。其中各个中心治疗效果的一致性评价是多中心临床试验中的一个关键问题。本文系统综述了关于多中心临床试验在评价整体一致性中的常用方法,对一致性评价方法的选择、检验的功效和假阳性的概率以及样本容量与方法之间的关系给出了一些简单的讨论,旨在为从事多中心临床工作者提供借鉴,希望有更多的国内学者关注这一领域的研究,推动多中心临床试验在我国的发展,为新药临床试验提供理论依据。 The multi-regional clinical trials(MRCTs) have received wide attention with an increasing trend of globalization of clinical trials.A key issue in MRCTs is how to assess the consistency of treatment effect across regions.In this paper,we provide a systematic review of methods that be commonly used for assessing the consistency in MRCTs.We also give some simple discussion about the choice of methods of assessing the consistency of treatment effect across regions,such as the power of the test,the false-positive rate and the relationship between the type I error and the sample size.The purpose of this paper is to provide some reference for the members in designing and conducting MRCTs and offer some theory evidences of clinical trails for new drug development.We hope that more researchers can concern this study in this field,promoting the development of MRCTs in our country.
出处 《中国临床药理学与治疗学》 CAS CSCD 2011年第10期1126-1131,共6页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(11171065)
关键词 多中心临床试验 一致性 异质性 定量 定性 Multi-regional clinical trials(MRCTs) Consistency Heterogeneity Quantitative Qualitative
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Blair JEA, Zannad F, Konstam MA,et al. Continental differences in clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes in patients hospitalized with worsening heart failure [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008,52 (20) : 1640-1648.
  • 2Wedel H, DeMets D, Deedwania P, et al. Challenges of subgroup analyses in multinational clinical trials: experiences from the MERIT HF trial[J]. Am Heart J, 2001, 142(3):502-511.
  • 3Akkerhuis KM, Deckers JW, Boersma E, et al. Geographic variabiiity in outcomes within an international trial of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndromes [J]. Eur Heart J Suppl, 2000, 21(5):371-381.
  • 4Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses[J]. BMJ, 2003, 327(7414) :557-560.
  • 5Der Simonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials[J]. Control Clin Trials, 1986, 7(4): 177- 188.
  • 6Fleiss. Analysis of data from multiclinic trials[J]. Control Clin Trials,1986, 7(4) :267-275.
  • 7Chow SC, Shao J, Hu YP. Assessing sensitivity and similarity in bridging studies[J]. J Biopharm Star, 2002, 12(3) :385-400.
  • 8Gail M, Simon R. Testing for qualitative interaction between treatment effects and patient subsets[J]. Biometrics,1985, 41(2) :361-372.
  • 9Piantadosi S, Gail M. A comparison of the power of two tests for qualitative interactions[J]. Stat Med, 1993,12(13) :1239-1248.
  • 10Ciminera JL, Heyse JF, Nguyen HH, et al. Tests for qualitative treatment-by-centre interaction using a'Pushbaek" procedure[J]. Stat Med, 1993, 12 (11) :1033-1045.

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部