摘要
追求判决一致是冲突法的古典抱负,传统反致之创设即服务于此一功效。拉塞尔开创双重反致先例之时并未释明其动机与理由。两种正相反对的解释路向彼此既不能证伪复又和谐兼容于双重反致,这表明应从第三维度即回归冲突法寻求判决一致之古典使命来解读其伦理取向。双重反致的生命力在于其能够为只能实现判决相对一致的传统反致所不能担保的判决绝对一致之目标提供绝对保证,精确致达冲突法之意向。判决一致本身不体现伦理深度,其实现方式才体现伦理深度。传统反致的相对性在于他律,双重反致的绝对性则得益于自律。立足于自律之上的双重反致移情换位于外国法院之立场,散发出为他人的伦理暗香。为他人的脆弱性及其可能走向的为难他人的背反结局使其危机再现。对我意识的终极溯源揭示了他人就是上帝的本体论结构,逃脱上帝的不可能性是对为他人伦理及作为其技术表达的双重反致之伦理困境及伦理密码的辩证破解。
The traditional renvoi is designed to pursue uniform judgments delivered by different jurisdic- tions which are the classic aspiration of conflict of laws. The scholars had regarded the double renvoi devised because he had not given any explanation about it. The fact that the two kinds of conflicting understandings cannot falsify each other and could coexist demonstrates that the ethical orientation of double renvoi should turn to the third dimension that is the classic mission undertaken by conflict of laws. The double renvoi provides the absolute guarantee for the absolutely uniform judgments which cannot be performed by traditional renvoi, and is exactly dedicated to the aim of conflict of laws. It is the realized way rather itself for uniform judgment that could signify the ethical depth. The heteronomy is the basis for partially uniform judgments, and the self - dis- cipline is the basis for the absolutely uniform ones. double renvoi sends out the fragrance of altruism virtue be- cause it considers the case standing in other' s shoes. The fragility and possible adverse consequence of altru- ism makes it fall into ethical crisis again. The ontological structure that others are prior, which could be traced from the self - consciousness, is the very dialectical' resolution to the ethical dilemma and code of double ren- voi that is technical expression of the structure.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第1期67-79,共13页
Law and Social Development
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"<涉外民事关系法律适用法>实施机制研究"(11YJC820161)
重庆市首批高等学校青年骨干教师资助计划"冲突法的可能性研究"
关键词
冲突法
判决一致
双重反致
为他人
伦理分析
conflict of laws
uniform judgment
double renvoi
for - the - other
ethical analysis