期刊文献+

Aversive and non-reward learning in the fire-bellied toad using familiar and unfamiliar prey stimuli

Aversive and non-reward learning in the fire-bellied toad using familiar and unfamiliar prey stimuli
原文传递
导出
摘要 The present study investigated how snapping behavior toward familiar and unfamiliar prey is modified by reward omission and aversive conditioning in the f^re-bellied toad Bombina orientalis. Toads were trained to snap at cricket images by rewarding them with live crickets. The task was learned, and the learning criterion (10 snapping responses within 2 minutes) was reached in all individuals investigated. Subsequent reward omission did not alter the frequency of snapping to the familiar cricket stimulus. Snapping decreased only in some individuals, when a mild foot shock was applied at snapping. However, at presenta- tion of images of hitherto unfamiliar meal worms and foot-shock application at snapping to the stimulus, the majority of toads diminished snapping significantly. Snapping responses decreased more rapidly, when snapping at meal worms was not rewarded or a footshock was applied uncorrelated to the presentation of or snapping at meal worms. These results demonstrate that in toads familiarity and unfamiliarity of prey stimuli are important factors in aversive learning, because well-trained responses to familiar stimuli become immune against reward omission. Furthermore, at presentation of unfamiliar stimuli, omission of reward and un- correlated footshock had a stronger aversive effect than correlated footshock [Current Zoology 57 (6): 709-716, 2011 ].
出处 《Current Zoology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第6期709-716,共8页 动物学报(英文版)
关键词 Negative conditioning Food preference AMPHIBIAN Bombina orientalis Response extinction 奖励 蟾蜍 猎物 学习 图像捕捉 东方铃蟾 频率捕捉 图像表示
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Bee MA, Gerhardt HC, 2001b. Neighbour-stranger discrimination by territorial male bullfrogs Rana catesbeiana: II. Perceptual basis. Anim. Behav. 62: 1141-1150.
  • 2Bilbo SD, Day LB, Wilczynski W, 2000. Anticholinergic effects in frogs in a Morris water maze analog. Physiol. Behav. 69: 351-357.
  • 3Brzoska J, Schneider H, 1978. Modification of prey-catching behavior by learning in the common toad (Bufo B bufo L, Anura, Amphibia): Changes in responses to visual objects and effects of auditory stimuli. Behav. Processes 3: 125-136.
  • 4Cabanac M, 1999. Emotion and phylogeny. Jpn. J. Physiol. 49: 1-10.
  • 5Cabanac A, Cabanac M, 2000. Heart rate response to gentle han- dling of frog and lizard. Behav. Processes 52: 89-95.
  • 6Cabanac A J, Cabanac M, 2004. No emotional fever in toads. Therm. Biol. 29: 669-673.
  • 7Cervantes-Perez F, Guevara-Pozas, AD, Herrera-Becerra AA, 1991. Modulation of prey-catching behavior in toads: Data and modeling. In: Arbib MA, Ewert JP ed. Visual Structures and Integrated Functions. Berlin: Springer, 397-415.
  • 8Crawford FT, Langdon JW, 1966. Escape and avoidance respon- ding in the toad. Psychon. Sci. 6: 115-116.
  • 9Daneri ME Papini MR, Muzio RN, 2007. Common toads Bufo arenarum learn to anticipate and avoid hypertonic saline solu- tions. J. Comp. Psychol. 121: 419-427.
  • 10Dimmitt MA, Ruibal R, 1980. Exploitation of food resources by spadefoot toads (Scaphiophus). Copeia 4: 854-862.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部