期刊文献+

教养方式、气质对青少年攻击的影响:独特、差别与中介效应检验 被引量:79

The Effects of Parenting Styles and Temperament on Adolescent Aggression: Examining Unique, Differential, and Mediation Effects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用"多前因变量-多结果变量"框架,探讨教养方式、气质对青少年直接和间接攻击有无独特效应与差别效应,以及规范信念(认为攻击他人是正确和可接受的)在其中的中介作用。660名青少年(平均年龄14.14岁,女生364人)报告了教养方式、气质特征、攻击信念和攻击行为的情况。多重和多元回归分析表明:(1)教养方式(权威、专制、纵容)对直接攻击独特效应不显著,气质(意志控制、愤怒挫折、感觉寻求)对直接攻击有独特效应;教养方式(权威、专制、纵容)和气质(意志控制、感觉寻求)对间接攻击有独特效应。(2)教养方式(权威、专制、纵容)与直接攻击的联系显著弱于其与间接攻击的联系,而气质(愤怒挫折、感觉寻求)与直接攻击的联系则显著强于其与间接攻击的联系。(3)两类规范信念与两类攻击具有不完全的特异性联系,而且直接规范在气质(意志控制、感觉寻求)与两类攻击之间具有中介作用,间接规范在教养方式(权威)与间接攻击、气质(愤怒挫折)与两类攻击之间具有中介作用。因此,教养方式和气质对不同形式攻击行为的影响不同,且这种影响可以部分地由规范信念加以解释。 Youth aggression is a worldwide public health problem. Understanding the antecedents of aggression is the precursor of any successful prevention and intervention. A large body of literature shows that parenting styles and temperament are closely related to aggressive behaviors in adolescence. However, our understanding of the association among these variables is limited in several ways. First, there is a paucity of research that examines the unique effects of parenting styles and temperament on aggression. Second, work is needed that distinguishes different forms of aggression (i.e., direct vs. indirect aggression) and examines the similarity of and differences among the antecedents of these behaviors. Third, the existing research is not clear about the underlying mechanisms in the relationship between parenting styles, temperament, and aggressive behaviors. The purpose of the present study is to investigate: 1) the unique and differential associations of parenting styles and temperament with direct and indirect aggression in adolescence; 2) whether adolescents' normative beliefs about aggression mediates the relationship between parenting styles or temperament, and direct and indirect aggression. Participants were 660 middle school students (mean age = 14.14 years, 364 females) recruited from a southern province in China's Mainland. In school, participants completed Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire, Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire (Revised Version, Short Form), and Aggressive Beliefs and Behaviors in Adolescence Scale. Multiple and multivariate regression analyses and permissive) were not significantly associated showed that (a) parenting styles (authoritative, authoritarian, with direct aggression, while temperamental characteristics (effortful control, anger/frustration, and sensation seeking) were uniquely associated with direct aggression. In contrast, parenting styles and temperament were both uniquely associated with indirect aggression. (b) Parenting styles were more strongly related to indirect aggression than to direct aggression. However, temperamental characteristics (anger/frustration and sensation seeking) were more strongly related to direct aggression than to indirect aggression. (c) Normative beliefs about direct aggression mediated the association between temperament and aggressive behaviors, while normative beliefs about indirect aggression mediated the association between parenting styles and temperament, and aggressive behaviors. In conclusion, parenting styles are to some extent specifically related to indirect aggression, whereas temperamental characteristics are specifically related to direct aggression. Normative beliefs about aggression are important mediators in the relationship between parenting styles, temperament, and aggression in adolescence.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期211-225,共15页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目(09JHQ044)
关键词 教养方式 气质 规范信念 直接攻击 间接攻击 青少年 parenting styles temperament normative beliefs direct aggression indirect aggression adolescents
  • 相关文献

参考文献60

  • 1Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27-51.
  • 2Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 4, 1-103.
  • 3Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185-1229.
  • 4Casas, J. F., Weigel, S. M., Crick, N. R., Ostrov, J. M., Woods K. E., Jansen Yeh, E. A., et al. (2006). Early parenting and children's relational and physical aggression in the preschool and home contexts. Applied Developmental Psychology, 27, 209-227.
  • 5Chang, L., Schwartz, D., Dodge, K. A., & McBride-Chang, C. (2003). Harsh parenting in relation to child emotion regulation and aggression. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 598-606.
  • 6Chao, R. K. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65, 1111-1119.
  • 7Chen, X. Y., Dong, Q., & Zhou, H. (1997). Authoritative and authoritarian parenting practices and social and school performance in Chinese children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 21,855-873.
  • 8陈英和,崔艳丽,耿柳娜.关于"关系性攻击"研究的新进展[J].心理科学,2004,27(3):708-710. 被引量:16
  • 9Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74-101.
  • 10Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710-722.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Crick N R & Jennifer K Grotpeter. Relation. Aggression, Gender,and Social - Psychological Adjustment. Child Development. 1995.60:710 - 722.
  • 2Crick N K, Bigbee M A, &Howes. Children' s normative beliefs about aggression:How do I hurt thee? Let me count the ways. Child Development, 1996, 67: 1003- 1014.
  • 3Crick N R & Werner N E. Response Decision Processes in Relational and Overt Aggression. Child Development, 1998, 69:1630- 1639.
  • 4Crick N R & Dodge K A, A review and reformulation of social information- processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment.Psychological Bulletion, 1994, 115:74 - 101.
  • 5Crick N R. Relational aggression: The role of intent attribution,feelings of distress, and provocation type. Development and Psychology, 1995, 7:313- 322.
  • 6Crick N R Grotpeter,J K&Bigbee M A. Relationally and Psysically Children' s Intent Attributions and Feelings of Distress For Relational and Instrumental Peer Provocations. Child Development, 2002, 73:1134 - 1142.
  • 7Crick N R, F Casas &Monique. Relational and overt aggression in preschool,Developmental Psyehiology, 1997, 33(4) :579 - 588.
  • 8Hart C H, Yang C, Nelson A, Robinson C C, Jin S, Win P, Olsen S F& Newell L D. Subtypes of aggression in Chinese, Russian, and U S Preschoolers: Gender and peer status linkages, J Kupersmidt(Chair), Social relationships and two forms of aggression: Gender considerations. Symposium conducted at the biennia meeting of the society for Research in Child Development. NM:Albuquerque, 1999.
  • 9Mechild Schafer, Nicole E, Werner and Crick N R. A comparison of two approaches to the study of negative peer treatment: General victimzition and bully victim problems among German school children, British Journal of Development Psychology, 2002, 20:281-306.
  • 10Jennifer K Grotpeter & Crick N R. Relational, Aggression, Overt Aggression, and Friendship. Child Development, 1996, 67 : 2328 -2338.

共引文献705

同被引文献1312

引证文献79

二级引证文献940

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部