期刊文献+

城市道路交通事故地点文字表述方法研究 被引量:4

Method of Urban Traffic Crash Location Record Description
下载PDF
导出
摘要 法律文书和交通安全分析要求事故地点记录准确、规范。为规范事故地点记录,在总结国外事故地点记录的点-线法、无规范格式法、线性参照系法、经纬度坐标法基础上,结合国内城市事故定位工作的需求,提出基于线性参照系的"五要素"事故地点文字表述方法。针对城市复杂道路网络,在道路分类的基础上,结合现场记录要求定义和说明"五要素"(事故所在道路、路侧、参照点、方位、距离),最后提出基于"五要素"的文字组合表述方法和事故地点记录实施方案。事故地点"五要素"记录法可供各地在改进事故地点记录时借鉴以提高事故数据的规范性。 Legal instruments and traffic accidents analysis require precise and uniform traffic crash loca- tion records. In order to standardize the traffic crash location records, a linear referencing system-based five elements crash location record description method was worked out after due consideration of domestic city accident location needs and foreign traffic crash record methods which included Link-Node System, Unformatted method, Linear Refenncing System, Longitude & Latitude System. According to the complex features of road network, based on the classification of Road, five essential elements ( road name, side of the road, referencing point, direction and distance) were defined and instructed for field operation. Final- ly, a five essential elements-based combination linguistic formulation method and a crash location record practical solution were proposed. In order to improve crash data collection, the proposed method can be applied by other cities.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期127-133,共7页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 上海市科学技术委员会基金资助(10JG0500400)
关键词 事故地点 文字表述 线性参照系统 “五要素” 事故地点类型 accident location linguistic formulation linear referencing system five essential elements classification of traffic crash location
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献15

  • 1Sorensen M, Elvik R. Black spot management and safety analysis of road networks. Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo, 2007.
  • 2U.S. Department of Transportation. Intermodal surface transportation efficiency act of 1991 (ISTEA) .Washington D C, 1991.
  • 3U.S. Department of Transportation. Transportation equity act for the 21st century (TEA-21). Washington D C, 1998.
  • 4Hauer E, Ng J C N, Lovell J. Estimation of safety at signalized intersections. Transport Research Record, 1988, 1185: 48-61.
  • 5Persaud B, Lyon C, Nguyen T. Empirical Bayes procedure for ranking sit for safety investigation by potential for improvement. Transportation Research Record, 1999, 1665: 7-12.
  • 6Hauer E, Allery B K, Kononov J. Screening the road network for sites with promise. Transportation Research Record, 2002, 1784: 27-32.
  • 7Montella A. A comparative analysis of hotspot identification methods. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2010, 42(1): 571-581.
  • 8Miaou S P, Lum H. Modeling vehicle accidents and highway geometric design relationships. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1993, 25(6): 689-709.
  • 9Poch M, Mannering E Negative binomial analysis of intersection-accident frequencies. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 1996, 122(2): 105-113.
  • 10Wang X, Abdel-Aty M. Temporal and spatial analyses of rear-end crashes at signalized intersections, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2006, 38(6): 1137-1150.

共引文献3

同被引文献479

引证文献4

二级引证文献351

;
使用帮助 返回顶部