期刊文献+

欧盟食品安全风险评估制度的基本原则之评析 被引量:10

An Analysis of the Basic Principles of EU Risk Assessment System for Food Safety
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以欧盟《统一食品安全法》和专门负责食品安全风险评估的欧盟食品安全管理局的相关指引以及其他与欧盟食品安全风险监管有关的政策为主要考察对象,可以发现欧盟食品安全风险评估制度的基本原则有四项,即科学上的卓越性原则、独立性原则、透明性原则和公众协商性原则。通过评析这些基本原则的主要含义、之所以成为基本原则的原因以及这些基本原则得以实现的具体机制,可以发现它们已经不是停留在纸面上的原则,这对我国食品安全风险评估制度的完善具有重要启发。 By conducting a research on EU's General Food Law, those directives of European Food Safety Authority and those policies regarding food safety, we can find four basic principles of EU risk assessment system for food safety: the principle of excellence; the principle of independence; the principle of transparency; the principle of public consultation. By analyzing their main meanings, the reason that became these basic principles and the specific mechanism that implemented these basic principles, we can find that these four basic principles don't stay on paper, which is of significance for improving China's risk assessment system for food safety.
出处 《北京行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期5-11,共7页 Journal of Beijing administration institute
基金 国家社科基金项目(10CFX040) 国家社科基金项目(11BFX096)
关键词 欧盟食品安全风险评估 欧盟《统一食品安全法》 《麦地那的奥尔特切报告》 疯牛病 EU risk assessment for food safety EU' s General Food Law Medina Ortega report "mad cow"disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1E.VOS,EU. Food Safety Regulation in the Aftermath of the BSE Crisis [J].Joumal of Consumer Policy,2000,23(3): 240-245.
  • 2D.CHALMERS. Food for Thought Reconciling Euro- pean Risks and Traditional Ways of Life [J]. The modem law review,2003,66 (4):532-562.
  • 3ELLEN VOS, FRANK WENDLER.Food Safety Regula- tion at the EU Level;Vos,E.,&Wendler, F. (Eds.). Food Safety Regulation in Europe: A Comparative Institutional Analysis[M].Antwerp: Intersentia Press,2006.
  • 4PATRICK VAN ZWANENBERG ERIK MILLSTONE. BSE: risk, science and governance [M].Oxford University Press, 2005: 4-5.
  • 5ORTWIN RENN.Risk Gover nance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World [M].London: Earthscan Press,2008:255.
  • 6COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNI- TIES.White Paper on Food Safety[M].Brussels,2000:3-10.
  • 7EFSA. Decision of the Executive Director Concerning the Selection of Members of the Scientific Committee, Scientific Panels and External Experts [EB/OL].http:// www.efsa.europa.eu/en/keydocs/docs/paneloperation.pdf. [2012-04-06].
  • 8EFSA. Quality assurance[EB/OL].http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsahow/quality.htm[2012 -04 -06].
  • 9MARTION DREYER, ORTWIN RENN. Food Safety Governance:Integrating Science,Precaution and Public Involvement [M].Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg Press, 2009 : 3.
  • 10E.MILLSTONE, P.VAN ZWANENBERG. The evo- lution of food safety policy-making institutions in the UK,EU and Codex Alimentarius [J]. Social Plocy&Ad- ministration,2002 : 593-609.

同被引文献129

  • 1宋华琳.中国食品安全标准法律制度研究[J].公共行政评论,2011,4(2):30-50. 被引量:45
  • 2陈家刚.风险社会与协商民主[J].马克思主义与现实,2006,58(3):95-105. 被引量:55
  • 3吴越,宁喜斌.欧盟食品安全新法规对我国水产品贸易的影响及其对策分析[J].食品工业科技,2006,27(8):186-189. 被引量:4
  • 4(美)威尔伯·施拉姆,威廉·波特,等.传播学概论[M].陈亮,等,译.北京:新华出版社,1984:144.
  • 5涂永前.美国食品安全法的制度创新[N].法制日报.2011-03-02.
  • 6加拿大诉澳大利亚-关于鲑鱼进口措施[EB/OL].中国经济网,http:/finance.oe.cn/macro/myal/200607/26/t20060726_7882650_6.shtml.2012-10-20.
  • 7宫文祥.当行政遇上科学:从风险评估谈起一以美国法为例[J].月旦法学杂志,2008,(2).
  • 8孙斯坦.风险与理性[J].师帅,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2005.
  • 9尹传红.专家的“偏见”[J].财经国家周刊,2011,(25).
  • 10李泰然.改进中国的食品安全风险管理[z].2010中国国际食品安全与质量控制会议发言.

引证文献10

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部