期刊文献+

Circular smooth muscle contributes to esophageal shortening during peristalsis 被引量:7

Circular smooth muscle contributes to esophageal shortening during peristalsis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:To study the angle between the circular smooth muscle(CSM) and longitudinal smooth muscle(LSM) fibers in the distal esophagus.METHODS:In order to identify possible mechanisms for greater shortening in the distal compared to proximal esophagus during peristalsis,the angles between the LSM and CSM layers were measured in 9 cadavers.The outer longitudinal layer of the muscularis propria was exposed after stripping the outer serosa.The inner circular layer of the muscularis propria was then revealed after dissection of the esophageal mucosa and the underlying muscularis mucosa.Photographs of each specimen were taken with half of the open esophagus folded back showing both the outer longitudinal and inner circular muscle layers.Angles were measured every one cm for 10 cm proximal to the squamocolumnar junction(SCJ) by two independent investigators.Two human esophagi were obtained from organ transplant donors and the angles between the circular and longitudinal smooth muscle layers were measured using micro-computed tomography(micro CT) and Image J software.RESULTS:All data are presented as mean ± SE.The CSM to LSM angle at the SCJ and 1 cm proximal to SCJ on the autopsy specimens was 69.3 ± 4.62 degrees vs 74.9 ± 3.09 degrees,P = 0.32.The CSM to LSM angle at SCJ were statistically significantly lower than at 2,3,4 and 5 cm proximal to the SCJ,69.3 ± 4.62 degrees vs 82.58 ± 1.34 degrees,84.04 ± 1.64 degrees,84.87 ± 1.04 degrees and 83.72 ± 1.42 degrees,P = 0.013,P = 0.008,P = 0.004,P = 0.009 respectively.The CSM to LSM angle at SCJ was also statistically significantly lower than the angles at 6,7 and 8 cm proximal to the SCJ,69.3 ± 4.62 degrees vs 80.18 ± 2.09 degrees,81.81 ± 1.75 degrees and 80.96 ± 2.04 degrees,P = 0.05,P = 0.02,P = 0.03 respectively.The CSM to LSM angle at 1 cm proximal to SCJ was statistically significantly lower than at 3,4 and 5 cm proximal to the SCJ,74.94 ± 3.09 degrees vs 84.04 ± 1.64 degrees,84.87 ± 1.04 degrees and 83.72 ± 1.42 degrees,P = 0.019,P = 0.008,P = 0.02 respectively.At 10 cm above SCJ the angle was 80.06 ± 2.13 degrees which is close to being perpendicular but less than 90 degrees.The CSM to LSM angles measured on virtual dissection of the esophagus and the stomach on micro CT at the SCJ and 1 cm proximal to the SCJ were 48.39 ± 0.72 degrees and 50.81 ± 1.59 degrees.Rather than the angle of the CSM and LSM being perpendicular in the esophagus we found an acute angulation between these two muscle groups throughout the lower 10 cm of the esophagus.CONCLUSION:The oblique angulation of the CSM may contribute to the significantly greater shortening of distal esophagus when compared to the mid and proximal esophagus during peristalsis. AIM:To study the angle between the circular smooth muscle(CSM) and longitudinal smooth muscle(LSM) fibers in the distal esophagus.METHODS:In order to identify possible mechanisms for greater shortening in the distal compared to proximal esophagus during peristalsis,the angles between the LSM and CSM layers were measured in 9 cadavers.The outer longitudinal layer of the muscularis propria was exposed after stripping the outer serosa.The inner circular layer of the muscularis propria was then revealed after dissection of the esophageal mucosa and the underlying muscularis mucosa.Photographs of each specimen were taken with half of the open esophagus folded back showing both the outer longitudinal and inner circular muscle layers.Angles were measured every one cm for 10 cm proximal to the squamocolumnar junction(SCJ) by two independent investigators.Two human esophagi were obtained from organ transplant donors and the angles between the circular and longitudinal smooth muscle layers were measured using micro-computed tomography(micro CT) and Image J software.RESULTS:All data are presented as mean ± SE.The CSM to LSM angle at the SCJ and 1 cm proximal to SCJ on the autopsy specimens was 69.3 ± 4.62 degrees vs 74.9 ± 3.09 degrees,P = 0.32.The CSM to LSM angle at SCJ were statistically significantly lower than at 2,3,4 and 5 cm proximal to the SCJ,69.3 ± 4.62 degrees vs 82.58 ± 1.34 degrees,84.04 ± 1.64 degrees,84.87 ± 1.04 degrees and 83.72 ± 1.42 degrees,P = 0.013,P = 0.008,P = 0.004,P = 0.009 respectively.The CSM to LSM angle at SCJ was also statistically significantly lower than the angles at 6,7 and 8 cm proximal to the SCJ,69.3 ± 4.62 degrees vs 80.18 ± 2.09 degrees,81.81 ± 1.75 degrees and 80.96 ± 2.04 degrees,P = 0.05,P = 0.02,P = 0.03 respectively.The CSM to LSM angle at 1 cm proximal to SCJ was statistically significantly lower than at 3,4 and 5 cm proximal to the SCJ,74.94 ± 3.09 degrees vs 84.04 ± 1.64 degrees,84.87 ± 1.04 degrees and 83.72 ± 1.42 degrees,P = 0.019,P = 0.008,P = 0.02 respectively.At 10 cm above SCJ the angle was 80.06 ± 2.13 degrees which is close to being perpendicular but less than 90 degrees.The CSM to LSM angles measured on virtual dissection of the esophagus and the stomach on micro CT at the SCJ and 1 cm proximal to the SCJ were 48.39 ± 0.72 degrees and 50.81 ± 1.59 degrees.Rather than the angle of the CSM and LSM being perpendicular in the esophagus we found an acute angulation between these two muscle groups throughout the lower 10 cm of the esophagus.CONCLUSION:The oblique angulation of the CSM may contribute to the significantly greater shortening of distal esophagus when compared to the mid and proximal esophagus during peristalsis.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第32期4317-4322,共6页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases,No. R01 DK079954,to Ruggieri MR and Miller LS
关键词 Esophageal shortening Gastroesophageal junction Circular smooth muscle Gastroesophageal reflux disease Esophageal contraction 平滑肌 食管 蠕动 计算机断层扫描 圆形 CSM LSM 角度测量
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Goyal RK, Chaudhury A. Physiology of normal esophageal motility. J Clin Gastroentero12008; 42:610-619.
  • 2Crist J, Gidda JS, Goyal RK. Intramural mechanism of esophageal peristalsis: roles of cholinergic and noncholiner- gic nerves. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984; 81:3595-3599.
  • 3Diamant NE. Neuromuscular mechanisms of primary peri- stalsis. Am J Med 1997; 103: 40S-43S.
  • 4Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Zhang Q, Jarosz A, Shah N, Kah- rilas PJ. Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high-resolu- tion manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physio12006; 290:G988-G997.
  • 5Pandolfino JE, Roman S. High-resolution manometry: an atlas of esophageal motility disorders and findings of GERD using esophageal pressure topography. Thorac Surg Clin 2011; 21:465-475.
  • 6Dodds WJ, Stewart ET, Hodges D, Zboralske FF. Movement of the feline esophagus associated with respiration and peri- stalsis. An evaluation using tantalum markers. J Clin Invest 1973; 52:1-13.
  • 7Edmundowicz SA, Clouse RE. Shortening of the esophagus in response to swallowing. Am J Physio11991; 260:G512-G516.
  • 8Pouderoux P, Lin S, Kahrilas PJ. Timing, propagation, coor- dination, and effect of esophageal shortening during peri-stalsis. Gastroenterology 1997; 112:1147-1154.
  • 9Vegesna AK, Tiwana MI, Braverman AS, Miller LS, Rug- gieri MR. T1896 Contractile Response of Porcine Esophageal Muscularis Mucosa to Carbachol. Gastroenterology 2010; 138: S-601.
  • 10Vegesna AK, Weissman S, Patel A, Makipour K, Miller LS. Sa1426 Transabdominal Ultrasound to Evaluate the Gastro- esophageal Junction in Normal Volunteers and Patients With GERD. Gastroenterology 2012; 142:S-302-S-303.

同被引文献36

  • 1贡雪灏,李泉水,张家庭,张青萍,朱桂金.经阴道超声探讨内膜波状运动对辅助生殖技术治疗结果的影响[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2006,15(6):446-448. 被引量:13
  • 2Vakil N, Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, et al. The Montreal definition and classificantion of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence?based consensus[J]. Am J Gastroenterol , 2006, 101(8) :1900-1920.
  • 3Dunn L J, Robertson A G, hnmanuel A, et al. Barrett's adenocarcinoma 52 years after subotal esophagectomy for pediatric stricture[J]. Ann T?horae Surg, 2010, 2(89): 604-606.
  • 4J.Lagergren, R. Bergstrom, A.Lindgren, et al. Symptomatic gastroeso?phageal reflux as a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 1999,340: 825-831.
  • 5W.H. Chow, W.o. Finkle, J.K. McLaughlin, et al. The relation of gastroesophageal reflux disease and its treatment to adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastric cardia[J]. JAMA.1995, 274: 474-477.
  • 6Bai L, Hu YD, Lin F. Research progress and relationship between non?erosive reflux disease and erosive esophagitis[J]. Int J Dig Dis, 2009, 29(6):379-380/40 I.
  • 7Soyer T, Keskil ZA, Somuncu S, et al. In vitro sensitivity of mouse esophagus to agonists in different pH mediurn value[J] J Pediatr Surg, 2007,42(12): 1988-1992.
  • 8Preiksaitis HG, Tremblay L, Diamant NE. Nitric oxide mediates inhibi?tory nerve effects in human esophageal sphincter[J]. Dig Dis Sic, 1994, 39:700-775.
  • 9Sim SM, Jiao Y, Preiksaitis HG. Regulation of intracellular calciurn in human esophagealsmoothmuscles[J]. Am J Physiol, 1997, 273:CI679- CI689.
  • 10Georgi V. petkov, Kiril K.Boev. Cyclopiazonic acid-induced changes in contractile activity of smooth muscle strips isolated from cat and guinea-pig stomach[J]. European Journal of Pharmacology, 1996, 318:109-115.

引证文献7

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部