期刊文献+

一种验证网格质量与CFD计算精度关系的方法 被引量:9

A method for confirming relationship between mesh quality measures and CFD numerical accuracy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对网格质量衡量准则与计算精度之间关系验证过程中的难题,提出一种准确验证它们之间关系的方法。该方法首先生成一系列不同单元数的网格,接着采用三维线性插值算法,获得相邻两套网格单元速度相对误差,当该误差小于某一阈值时,则认为此网格计算得到的数值解为网格独立解。此外,在网格独立解的基础之上,获得不完善网格中各单元的计算误差,并与各单元的度量值建立相应的数据库,采用不同的统计方法对其进行对比分析,获得它们之间的关系。研究结果表明:同质量衡量准则QEVS和QEAS相比,本文提出的质量衡量准则QNEW1和QNEW2在误差较大的区间内(E re>0.15),与计算精度有较好的关系。因此,在网格生成过程中,采用QNEW1和QNEW2能够正确地评判出对计算精度影响较大的单元,而QEVS和QEAS则不能。 In order to investigate the relationship between the mesh quality measures and CFD numerical accuracy,a new confirming method was proposed.Firstly,a series of meshes with different numbers of elements were generated.Then,based on the three-dimensional linear interpolation algorithm,the relative velocity errors between adjacent meshes were obtained.When the error was less than the threshold value,the solution was considered as the grid-independent solution.Meanwhile,the error and the quality of each element in imperfect meshes formed a database.The database was analyzed and the relationship between the mesh quality measures and numerical accuracy was acquired.The results show that compared with the metrics QEVS and QEAS,the metrics QNEW1 and QNEW2 have better relationship in the high-error interval(error E re0.15).Therefore,the metric QNEW1 and QNEW2 can correctly evaluate the elements which have greater effects on the numerical accuracy,but the metric QNEW1 and QNEW2 can not.
出处 《中南大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第11期4293-4299,共7页 Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology
基金 国家杰出青年基金资助项目(50825902) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51079062 51109095) 江苏省2010年研究生创新计划项目(CX10B_263Z)
关键词 网格质量 CFD计算精度 网格独立解 四面体网格 mesh quality CFD numerical accuracy grid-independent solution tetrahedral mesh
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Munson T. Mesh shape-quality optimization using the inverse mean-ratio metric[J]. Mathematical Programming, 2007, 110(3): 561-590.
  • 2黄晓东,杜群贵.二维有限元网格的局部加密方法[J].华南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2004,32(12):56-60. 被引量:7
  • 3Park J, Shontz S M. Two derivative-free optimization algorithms for mesh quality improvement[J]. International Conference on Computational Science, 2010, 1(1): 387-396.
  • 4Hetmaniuk U, Knupp P. A mesh optimization algorithm to decrease the maximum interpolation error of linear triangular finite dements[J]. Engineering with Computers, 2010, 27(1): 3-15.
  • 5Knupp P M. Algebraic mesh quality metric[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2001, 23(1): 193-218.
  • 6Babuska I, Flaherty J E, Henshaw W D, et al. Modeling, mesh generation, and adaptive numerical methods for partial differential equations[M]. New York: Springer, 1995: 97-127.
  • 7Gosselin S, Ollivier-Gooch C. Tetrahedral mesh generation using Delaunay refinement with non-standard quality measures[J].International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2011, 87(8): 795-820.
  • 8Dompierre J, Vallet M G, Labbe P, et al. An analysis of simplex shape measures for anisotropic meshes[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 194(48/49): 4895-4914.
  • 9Freitag L A, Knupp P M. Tetrahedral element shape optimization via the Jacobian determinant and condition number[C]// Proceedings of the 8th International Meshing. California, 1999: 247-258.
  • 10董亮,刘厚林,谈明高,路明臻,王勇,王凯.离心泵四面体网格质量衡量准则及优化算法[J].西安交通大学学报,2011,45(11):100-105. 被引量:13

二级参考文献26

  • 1刘重阳,于芳,徐让书.CFD计算网格误差分析的一个算例[J].沈阳航空工业学院学报,2006,23(4):21-24. 被引量:8
  • 2李想,顾春伟.某离心叶轮的CFD分析和结果确认[J].工程热物理学报,2008,29(8):1291-1296. 被引量:2
  • 3XU K, CHENG Z Q. Quality encoding for tetrahedral mesh optimization[J]. Computers & Graphics, 2009, 33(3) : 250-261.
  • 4TOURNOIS J, WORMSER C. Interleaving Delaunay refinement and optimization for practical isotropic tet- rahedron mesh generation[J]. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2010, 28(3): 1557-1571.
  • 5AHN H T, BRANETS L. Moving boundary simula- tions with dynamic mesh smoothing [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2010, 64 (8) : 887-907.
  • 6MAO Z H, MA L Z. A modified Laplacian smoothing approach with mesh saliency [J].Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2006, 47(2): 105-113.
  • 7HETMANIUK U, KNUPP P. A mesh optimization algorithm to decrease the maximum interpolation error of linear triangular finite elements [J]. Engineering with Computers, 2010, 27(1): 3-15.
  • 8LIU A, JOE B. Relationship between tetrahedron shape measures [J].Numerical Mathematics, 1994,34 (2) :268-287.
  • 9LOS H. Optimization of tetrahedron meshes based on element shape measures [J]. Computers &Structures, 1997, 63(5): 951-961.
  • 10Cavendish J C, Field D A, Frey W H. An approach to automatic three-dimensional finite element mesh generation [J]. lnt J Numer Meth Engng, 1985,21 :329-347.

共引文献30

同被引文献140

引证文献9

二级引证文献36

;
使用帮助 返回顶部