王逸评屈原“同姓无相去之义”的历史文化解读

A Comment by Wang Yi on the Historical and Cultural Interpretations of Qu Yuan's "Men with the Same Surname of King Shall Never Betray Their Native Land"

屈原在"君臣以义合,不合则去"的历史环境中,本不受"同姓无去国之义"的道德约束,而以其屡谏不入遭疏放却不去国的行事,树立了春秋战国时期以宗亲之忠和母国之怀"睠顾楚国,系心怀王"的自觉的特例。东汉王逸为回应贾谊、司马迁、扬雄、班固等人评论屈原去就取向的异见,把董仲舒为适应汉武帝中央集权统治需要建立的《春秋》"公子无去国之义"改造为"同姓无去国之义",以对中央朝廷的向背作为标准评说屈原的独特行为。

In the historical context of ＂King and Ministers are harmonious on the basis of sharing the same righteousness doctrines,otherwise they depart each other＂,Qu Yuna can obviously be free from the restriction of ＂Men with the same surname of King shall never betray their native land＂.Regardless of his repeated remonstrations and being banished by the king,he was still reluctant to leave his native land.＂With Chu State and King Chuhuai in Heart＂,he set a unique example of showing strong clan-attached loyalty and native land complex.Wang Yi in East Han Dynasty responded to the various opinions of Qu Yuan＇s insistent stay in Chu State by Jia Yi,Sima Qian,Yang Xiong,Ban Gu.And taking Dong Zongshu＇s change of ＂the offspring of the king＇s clan＂ to ＂Men with the same surname of king shall never betray their native land＂ and the attitude to the central court as the criteria,he made a comment on Qu Yuan＇s insistent stay in Chu State.