期刊文献+

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography assessment of gastric cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy 被引量:18

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography assessment of gastric cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:To quantitatively assess the ability of double contrast-enhanced ultrasound(DCUS) to detect tumor early response to pre-operative chemotherapy.METHODS:Forty-three patients with gastric cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by curative resection between September 2011 and February 2012 were analyzed.Pre-operative chemotherapy regimens of fluorouracil + oxaliplatin or S-1 + oxaliplatin were administered in 2-4 cycles over 6-12 wk periods.All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography(CT) scan and DCUS before and after two courses of pre-operative chemotherapy.The therapeutic response was assessed by CT using the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors(RECIST 1.1) criteria.Tumor area was assessed by DCUS as enhanced appearance of gastric carcinoma due to tumor vascularity during the contrast phase as compared to the normal gastric wall.Histopathologic analysis was carried out according to the Mandard tumor regression grade criteria and used as the reference standard.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy of DCUS parameters in differentiating histopathological responders from non-responders.RESULTS:The study population consisted of 32 men and 11 women,with mean age of 59.7 ± 11.4 years.Neither age,sex,histologic type,tumor site,T stage,nor N stage was associated with pathological response.The responders had significantly smaller mean tumor size than the non-responders(15.7 ± 7.4 cm vs 33.3 ± 14.1 cm,P < 0.01).According to Mandard's criteria,27 patients were classified as responders,with 11(40.7%) showing decreased tumor size by DCUS.In contrast,only three(18.8%) of the 16 non-responders showed decreased tumor size by DCUS(P < 0.01).The area under the ROC curve was 0.64,with a 95%CI of 0.46-0.81.The effects of several cut-off points on diagnostic parameters were calculated in the ROC curve analysis.By maximizing Youden's index(sensitivity + specificity-1),the best cut-off point for distinguishing responders from non-responders was determined,which had optimal sensitivity of 62.9% and specificity of 56.3%.Using this cut-off point,the positive and negative predictive values of DCUS for distinguishing responders from non-responders were 70.8% and 47.4%,respectively.The overall accuracy of DCUS for therapeutic response assessment was 60.5%,slightly higher than the 53.5% for CT response assessment with RECIST criteria(P = 0.663).Although the advantage was not statistically significant,likely due to the small number of cases assessed.DCUS was able to identify decreased perfusion in responders who showed no morphological change by CT imaging,which can be occluded by such treatment effects as fibrosis and edema.CONCLUSION:DCUS may represent an innovative tool for more accurately predicting histopathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgical resection in patients with locally-advanced gastric cancer. AIM:To quantitatively assess the ability of double contrast-enhanced ultrasound(DCUS) to detect tumor early response to pre-operative chemotherapy.METHODS:Forty-three patients with gastric cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by curative resection between September 2011 and February 2012 were analyzed.Pre-operative chemotherapy regimens of fluorouracil + oxaliplatin or S-1 + oxaliplatin were administered in 2-4 cycles over 6-12 wk periods.All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography(CT) scan and DCUS before and after two courses of pre-operative chemotherapy.The therapeutic response was assessed by CT using the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors(RECIST 1.1) criteria.Tumor area was assessed by DCUS as enhanced appearance of gastric carcinoma due to tumor vascularity during the contrast phase as compared to the normal gastric wall.Histopathologic analysis was carried out according to the Mandard tumor regression grade criteria and used as the reference standard.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy of DCUS parameters in differentiating histopathological responders from non-responders.RESULTS:The study population consisted of 32 men and 11 women,with mean age of 59.7 ± 11.4 years.Neither age,sex,histologic type,tumor site,T stage,nor N stage was associated with pathological response.The responders had significantly smaller mean tumor size than the non-responders(15.7 ± 7.4 cm vs 33.3 ± 14.1 cm,P 0.01).According to Mandard's criteria,27 patients were classified as responders,with 11(40.7%) showing decreased tumor size by DCUS.In contrast,only three(18.8%) of the 16 non-responders showed decreased tumor size by DCUS(P 0.01).The area under the ROC curve was 0.64,with a 95%CI of 0.46-0.81.The effects of several cut-off points on diagnostic parameters were calculated in the ROC curve analysis.By maximizing Youden's index(sensitivity + specificity-1),the best cut-off point for distinguishing responders from non-responders was determined,which had optimal sensitivity of 62.9% and specificity of 56.3%.Using this cut-off point,the positive and negative predictive values of DCUS for distinguishing responders from non-responders were 70.8% and 47.4%,respectively.The overall accuracy of DCUS for therapeutic response assessment was 60.5%,slightly higher than the 53.5% for CT response assessment with RECIST criteria(P = 0.663).Although the advantage was not statistically significant,likely due to the small number of cases assessed.DCUS was able to identify decreased perfusion in responders who showed no morphological change by CT imaging,which can be occluded by such treatment effects as fibrosis and edema.CONCLUSION:DCUS may represent an innovative tool for more accurately predicting histopathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgical resection in patients with locally-advanced gastric cancer.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第47期7026-7032,共7页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by National Science Foundation of China,No. 81101834 Projects of the Health Bureau of Zhejiang Province, No.2009QN011 and 2011KYB037
关键词 Gastric cancer CHEMOTHERAPY Ultrasonic imaging Predictive value of tests Disease management 定量评估 治疗效果 化疗 胃癌 造影 超声 计算机断层扫描 病理组织学
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献13

  • 1Eisenhauer EA,Therasse P,Bogaerts J,Schwartz LH,Sar- gent D,Ford R,Dancey J,Arbuck S,Gwyther S,Mooney M, Rubinstein L,Shankar L,Dodd L,Kaplan R,Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 228-247.
  • 2Varallyay CG,Muldoon LL,Gahramanov S,Wu YJ,Good- man JA,Li X,Pike MM,Neuwelt EA. Dynamic MRI using iron oxide nanoparticles to assess early vascular effects of antiangiogenic versus corticosteroid treatment in a glioma model. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2009; 29: 853-860.
  • 3Young H,Baum R,Cremerius U,Herholz K,Hoekstra O, Lammertsma AA,Pruim J,Price P. Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxy- glucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Re- search and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35: 1773-1782.
  • 4Adam R,Avisar E,Ariche A,Giachetti S,Azoulay D,Casta- ing D,Kunstlinger F,Levi F,Bismuth F. Five-year survival following hepatic resection after neoadjuvant therapy for nonresectable colorectal. Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8: 347-353.
  • 5Scheele J,Stang R,Altendorf-Hofmann A,Paul M. Resection of colorectal liver metastases. World J Surg ; 19: 59-71.
  • 6Power DG,Kemeny NE. Role of adjuvant therapy after re- section of colorectal cancer liver metastases. J Clin Oncol 2010;28: 2300-2309.
  • 7Adam R,Pascal G,Castaing D,Azoulay D,Delvart V,Paule B,Levi F,Bismuth H. Tumor progression while on chemo- therapy: a contraindication to liver resection for multiple colorectal metastases? Ann Surg 2004; 240: 1052-1061; discus- sion 1052-1061.
  • 8Hurwitz H,Fehrenbacher L,Novotny W,Cartwright T, Hainsworth J,Heim W,Berlin J,Baron A,Griffing S,Hol- mgren E,Ferrara N,Fyfe G,Rogers B,Ross R,Kabbinavar F. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan,fluorouracil,and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 2335-2342.
  • 9Kabbinavar F,Hurwitz HI,Fehrenbacher L,Meropol NJ, Novotny WF,Lieberman G,Griffing S,Bergsland E. Phase II, randomized trial comparing bevacizumab plus fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) with FU/LV alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 60-65.
  • 10Malavasi N,Ponti G,Depenni R,Bertolini F,Zironi S,Luppi G,Conte PF. Complete pathological response in a patient with multiple liver metastases from colon cancer treated with Folfox-6 chemotherapy plus bevacizumab: a case report. J Hematol Oncol 2009; 2: 35.

共引文献15

同被引文献164

引证文献18

二级引证文献96

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部