期刊文献+

ABR反应器中COD/SO_4^(2-)值和硫酸盐负荷对SO_4^(2-)去除影响 被引量:3

Effects of COD/SO_4^(2-) Ratio and Sulfate Loading Rate on Sulfate Removal in Anaerobic Baffle Reactor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用厌氧折流板反应器,分别考察了反应器启动,及不同COD/SO42-比值和硫酸盐负荷对模拟废水中SO42-去除的影响。实验在(32±0.1)℃,pH为6.0~6.5的条件下连续运行。结果表明:ABR经过约90 d的启动驯化阶段后,进水硫酸盐及COD浓度分别为1 500 mg/L和3 000 mg/L,水力停留时间为12 h条件下,硫酸盐去除率达到了92%。固定COD/SO42-比值为2.5时,随着进水SO42-浓度的增加(1 500~3 500 mg/L),SO42-去除率逐渐下降,最低为60%,相反SO42-去除速率随着硫酸盐浓度的增加而增加,最大为7.98 kg(/m3.d);维持恒定的硫酸盐浓度(1 500 mg/L),逐渐缩短水力停留时间以提高反应器中硫酸盐负荷,SO42-去除率呈现先上升后下降的复杂变化趋势,当水力停留时间为6 h时,SO42-去除率达到最大;随着COD/SO42-比值的提高,硫酸盐去除能力增强,且反应体系对硫酸盐负荷的耐受能力也逐渐增强。 Start-up period and effects of different COD/SO42-ratios and sulfate loading rates on sulfate removal of simulated wastewater containing high sulfate concentration were assessed at(32±0.1)℃ and pH 6.0~6.5 in a laboratory scale anaerobic baffled reactor(ABR).Results showed that the final sulfate removal efficiency rose to 92% with influent SO42-1 500 mg/L and COD 3 000 mg/L,HRT 12h,through the procedure of about 90 d stat-up.With fixed COD/SO42-ratio as 2.5,sulfate removal efficiencies all above 60% reduced with an increase in the influent sulfate concentration ranging from 1 500 mg/L to 3 500 mg/L,yet removal rate of sulfate increased to the maximum 7.98 kg(/ m3.d).With fixed influent sulfate concentration 1 500 mg/L,hydraulic retention time(HRT) had a complex effect on sulfate removal,and sulfate removal efficiencies peaked when HRT was 6h,regardless of COD/SO42-ratios.With an up-regulation of COD/SO42-ratio ranging from 2 to 5,removal efficiencies of sulfate ascended and the system presented stronger tolerance to the sulfate loading rate.
出处 《环境科学与技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期115-119,共5页 Environmental Science & Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金(51074195)
关键词 厌氧折流板反应器 COD SO42- 硫酸盐负荷率 硫酸盐去除 anaerobic baffle reactor COD/SO42- sulfate loading rate sulfate removal
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Lens P, Vallerol M, Esposito G, et al. Perspectives of sul- fate reducing bioreactors in environmental biotechnology[J]. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 2002,1(4) :311-325.
  • 2Sheoran A, Sheoran V, Choudhary R. Bioremediation of acid-rock drainage by sulphate-reducing prokaryotes:a review [J]. Minerals Engineering, 2010,23 ( 14 ) : 1073-1100.
  • 3Johnson D, Hallberg K. Acid mine drainage remediation options [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2005, 338: 3-14.
  • 4Sarti A, Pozzi E, Chinalia F, et al. Microbial processes andbacterial populations associated to anaerobic treatment of sulfate-rich wastewater[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2010, 45 (2) : 164-170.
  • 5李玲,贺延龄,顾昕.两相UASB反应器处理含高浓度硫酸盐废水[J].环境科学与技术,2011,34(2):136-138. 被引量:23
  • 6Zhao Yang-guo, Wang Ai-jie, Ren Nan-qi. Effect of carbon sources on sulfidogenic bacterial communities during the starting-up of acidogenic sulfate reducing bioreactors[J]. Biorcsource Technology,2010,101(9) :2952-2959.
  • 7Sabumon P. Development of enhanced sulphidogenesis process for the treatment of wastewater having low COD/ SO42- ratio[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008,159 (2- 3) : 616-625.
  • 8Bayrakdar A, Sahinkaya E, Gungor M, et al. Performance of sulfidogenic anaerobic baffled reactor(ABR) treating acidic and zinc-containing wastewater[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(19) :4354-4360.
  • 9Bekmezci O, Ucar D, Kaksonen A, et al. Sulfidogenic biotreatment of synthetic acid mine drainage and sulfide oxidation in anaerobic baffled reactor[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 189(3) :670-676.
  • 10Gopala K, Kumar P. Treatment of low-strength soluble wastewater using an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR)[J].Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90( 1 ) : 166- 176.

二级参考文献6

共引文献511

同被引文献41

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部