期刊文献+

两种不同检测系统测定血清总蛋白的可比性分析 被引量:1

Comparative analysis on detection results of serum total protein between two different detection systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨COBAS C501模块化全自动生化分析仪与Biosystems A15全自动蛋白分析仪检测结果是否具有可比性。方法依据国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)EP9-A2文件要求,分别用两种检测系统测定血清总蛋白(TP),计算实验检测系统(Y)和目标检测系统(X)之间的系统误差,以美国临床医学检验部门修正法(CLIA′88)建议的医学决定水平处的系统误差来判断不同检测系统之间的可比性。结果在所测定TP中,预期偏差在方法线性范围内均可以被接受。结论 TP可在两检测系统上任意检测。当同一项目在不同仪器上检测时,结果应进行比对和偏倚评估,以保证检测结果的可比性。 Objective To explore the comparability of detection results by COBAS C501 and Biosystems A15 detection systems. Methods According to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) document EPgA2,we tested total protein(TP) with two detection systems. Then the system bias between different test sys tems was evaluated by obtained equation. The comparability of different investigated system was judged according to the total error allowed by clinical laboratory improvement amendment 88(CLIA'88). Results Among these results of TP,the anticipated bias was acceptable within methodological linear limitation. Conclusion TP could be tested by either of the two analytical systems. But for the tests, there are more than two sets of analytical systems in the labora- tory, the analytical comparison and bias evaluation should be made. Only after accurate evaluation evidence about the bias of their items in the different analytical systems is obtained, the accuracy and stability of testing results could be ensured.
出处 《检验医学与临床》 CAS 2013年第6期689-690,693,共3页 Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
关键词 血清总蛋白 比对 偏倚评估 total protein comparison bias evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献14

  • 1李传达,袁平宗.两种丙氨酸氨基转移酶试剂的对比研究及偏倚评估[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(10):1082-1083. 被引量:15
  • 2李萍,刘小娟,徐克和,黄志刚.利用Westgard标准决定图判定测定方法性能[J].临床检验杂志,2006,24(1):69-70. 被引量:27
  • 3张秀明,庄俊华,徐宁,黄宪章,陈茶,尹一兵,梁伟雄.不同检测系统血清酶测定结果的偏倚评估与可比性研究[J].中华检验医学杂志,2006,29(4):346-349. 被引量:137
  • 4邱玲,程歆琦,鄢盛恺,沈瑛,刘茜,刘荔,刘福成,葛增梅.临床化学方法验证与表格化管理[J].现代检验医学杂志,2006,21(4):5-9. 被引量:10
  • 5NCCLS. Method Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples.. NCCLS Document EPg-A2, ISBN 1- 56238-472-4[S]. Wayne, PA : NCCLS, 2002.
  • 6Westgard JO.A method evaluation decision chart (MEDx Chart)for judging method performance.Clin Lab Sci,1995,8:277-283.
  • 7Ricos C,Alvarez V,Cava F,et al.Current databases on biological variation:pros,cons and progress.Scand J Clin Lab Invest,1999,59:491-500.
  • 8Westgard JO,Burnett RW.Precision requirements for costeffective operation of analytical processes.Clin Chem,1990,36:1629-1632.
  • 9National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples; approved guideline. EP9-A, Pennsylvania. NCCLS, 1986:1-14.
  • 10冯仁丰.临床检验质量管理技术基础.见:丛玉隆,冯仁丰。陈晓东,主编.临床实验室管理学.北京:中国医药科技出版社,2004:112.

共引文献128

同被引文献6

  • 1Doumas BT,Bayse DD,Carter RJ ,et al. A candidate refer- ence method for determination of total protein in serum. Ⅰ. development and validation[J]. Clin Chem, 1981,27 (10) : 1651-1654.
  • 2Doumas BT, Bayse DD,Carter R J, et al. A candidate refer- ence method for determination of total protein in serum. Ⅱ. test for transferability[J]. Clin Chem, 1981,27 (10) : 1642 1650.
  • 3National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. User verification of performance for precision and true- ness: approved guideline-second edition [ S]. EP15-A2, NCCLS,2008.
  • 4National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. E- valuation of linearity of quantitative measurement proce- dures: a statistical approach ; approved guideline [ S]. EP6- A,NCCLS,2003.
  • 5National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. E- valuation of the linearity of cluantitative measurement pro- cedures: a statistical approach, approved guideline [S]. EP6-A,2003.
  • 6王时南,杨欢.两种校准品和3种双缩脲试剂测定血清总蛋白结果偏倚评估及方法学评价[J].医学研究杂志,2011,40(10):125-128. 被引量:5

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部